Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 296

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Visual dysfunction in multiple sclerosis correlates better with optical coherence tomography derived estimates of macular ganglion cell layer thickness than peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness

Saidha, Shiv, Syc, Stephanie B., Durbin, Mary K., Eckstein, Christopher, Oakley, Jonathan D., Meyer, Scott A., Conger, Amy, Frohman, Teresa C., Newsome, Scott, Ratchford, John N., Frohman, Elliot M., Calabresi, Peter A.·2011·Multiple Sclerosis Journal

Abstract

Background: Post-mortem analyses of multiple sclerosis (MS) eyes demonstrate prominent retinal neuronal ganglion cell layer (GCL) loss, in addition to related axonal retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) loss. Despite this, clinical correlations of retinal neuronal layers remain largely unexplored in MS. Objectives: To determine if MS patients exhibit in vivo retinal neuronal GCL loss, deeper retinal neuronal loss, and investigate correlations between retinal layer thicknesses, MS clinical subtype and validated clinical measures. Methods: Cirrus HD-optical coherence tomography (OCT), utilizing automated intra-retinal layer segmentation, was performed in 132 MS patients and 78 healthy controls. MS classification, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and visual function were recorded in study subjects. Results: GCL+inner plexiform layer (GCIP) was thinner in relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS; n = 96, 71.6 µm), secondary progressive MS (SPMS; n = 20, 66.4 µm) and primary progressive MS (PPMS; n = 16, 74.1 µm) than in healthy controls (81.8 µm; p < 0.001 for all). GCIP thickness was most decreased in SPMS, and although GCIP thickness correlated significantly with disease duration, after adjusting for this, GCIP thickness remained significantly lower in SPMS than RRMS. GCIP thickness correlated significantly, and better than RNFL thickness, with EDSS, high-contrast, 2.5% low-contrast and 1.25% low-contrast letter acuity in MS. 13.6% of patients also demonstrated inner or outer nuclear layer thinning. Conclusions: OCT segmentation demonstrates in vivo GCIP thinning in all MS subtypes. GCIP thickness demonstrates better structure-function correlations (with vision and disability) in MS than RNFL thickness. In addition to commonly observed RNFL/GCIP thinning, retinal inner and outer nuclear layer thinning occur in MS.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1352458511418630

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Cited by

See all 296

Metadata

Authors
Saidha, S., Syc, S. B., Durbin, M. K., Eckstein, C., Oakley, J. D., Meyer, S. A., Conger, A., Frohman, T. C., Newsome, S., Ratchford, J. N., Frohman, E. M., & Calabresi, P. A.
Venue
Multiple Sclerosis Journal
Published
2011-08-24
Volume
17
Issue
12
Pages
1449-1463
ISSN
  • 1352-4585 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0970
OpenAlex
W2006175679
Cited by
296
References
31
FWCI
10.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Visual dysfunction in multiple sclerosis correlates better with optical coherence tomography derived estimates of macular ganglion cell layer thickness than peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1352458511418630
The paper
Saidha, S., Syc, S. B., Durbin, M. K., Eckstein, C., Oakley, J. D., Meyer, S. A., Conger, A., Frohman, T. C., Newsome, S., Ratchford, J. N., Frohman, E. M., & Calabresi, P. A. (2011). Visual dysfunction in multiple sclerosis correlates better with optical coherence tomography derived estimates of macular ganglion cell layer thickness than peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. Multiple Sclerosis Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458511418630

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.