The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Outcomes assessment in multiple sclerosis clinical trials: a critical analysis
Abstract
The feasibility and precision of clinical trials for the treatment of MS must be improved Subsequent to the approval by the Food and Drug Administration of the United States of interferon beta-1b as a safe and effective, though not curative, treatment for relapsing-remitting MS, the testing of other agents in this disease has been undertaken or is anticipated. This report summarises the discussions and recommendations of an international workshop held to review critically the elements of current MS therapeutic trials and to identify the most important aspects of clinical evaluation, study design and data analysis that would allow agents for MS to be tested as accurately, rapidly and economically as possible. While acknowledging the many uncertainties about the pathophysiology and natural history of MS, the workshop participants made recommendations about the preferred components to be used in the design of trials which may be different depending on the treatment goal and agent studied. It was concluded that the formulation of a useful clinical trial design must be based on specific guidelines for clinical scales and imaging for which task forces were recommended and subsequently appointed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: An expanded disability status scale (EDSS)
Kurtzke, J. F. (1983) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.33.11.1444 · Cited by 15,011
Statistical data analysis in the computer age
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.253.5018.390 · Cited by 1,192
Katz, D., Taubenberger, J. K., Cannella, B., McFarlin, D. E., Raine, C. S., & McFarland, H. F. (1993) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410340507 · Cited by 387
Self-citation
Cited by
Kappos, L., Moeri, D., Radue, E. W., Schoetzau, A., Schweikert, K., Barkhof, F., Miller, D., Guttmann, C. R., Weiner, H. L., Gasperini, C., et al. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(98)03053-0 · Cited by 499
Miller, D. H., Albert, P. S., Barkhof, F., Francis, G., Frank, J. A., Hodgkinson, S., Lublin, F. D., Paty, D. W., Reingold, S. C., & Simon, J. (1996) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410390104 · Cited by 444
Self-citationHohol, M. J., Orav, E. J., & Weiner, H. L. (1999) · Multiple Sclerosis Journal · doi:10.1177/135245859900500508 · Cited by 369
The Guy's Neurological Disability Scale (GNDS): a new disability measure for multiple sclerosis
Sharrack, B., & Hughes, R. A. (1999) · Multiple Sclerosis Journal · doi:10.1177/135245859900500406 · Cited by 293
Validity of performance scales for disability assessment in multiple sclerosis
Marrie, R. A., & Goldman, M. (2007) · Multiple Sclerosis Journal · doi:10.1177/1352458507078388 · Cited by 285
Metadata
- Authors
- Whitaker, J., McFarland, H., Rudge, P., & Reingold, S.
- Venue
- Multiple Sclerosis Journal
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1995-04
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 37-47
- ISSN
- 1352-4585 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0970
- OpenAlex
- W2151529161
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Outcomes assessment in multiple sclerosis clinical trials: a critical analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/135245859500100107
- The paper
- Whitaker, J., McFarland, H., Rudge, P., & Reingold, S. (1995). Outcomes assessment in multiple sclerosis clinical trials: a critical analysis. Multiple Sclerosis Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/135245859500100107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.