Cited by 176Physical Education and PedagogyChildren's Physical and Motor DevelopmentPhysical Activity and Health

A systematic review of the effectiveness of physical education and school sport interventions targeting physical activity, movement skills and enjoyment of physical activity

Dudley, Dean, Okely, Anthony, Pearson, Philip, Cotton, Wayne·2011·European Physical Education Review

Abstract

This article presents a systematic review of published literature on the effectiveness of physical education in promoting participation in physical activity, enjoyment of physical activity and movement skill proficiency in children and adolescents. The review utilized a literature search, specifically publications listed in Ovid, A+ Education, ERIC, Sports Discus, Science Direct, PsychInfo from 1990 to June 2010. The literature search yielded 27,410 potentially relevant publications. Twenty-three articles met the inclusion criteria established for this review and applied by three independent reviewers. Articles were rated independently by three reviewers using a 10-item methodological quality scale derived from the CONSORT 2010 statement. The results of the review detail the nature, scope and focus of intervention strategies reported, and reported outcomes of interventions. The most effective strategies to increase children’s levels of physical activity and improve movement skills in physical education were direct instruction teaching methods and providing teachers with sufficient and ongoing professional development in using these physical education (PE) instruction methods. However, the review revealed a lack of high quality evaluations and statistical power to draw conclusions concerning the effectiveness of interventions conducted in physical education and school sport to improve enjoyment outcomes. It is argued that adequately powered interventions that target movement skills in secondary schools and evaluate school sport curriculum are urgently needed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1356336x11416734

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dudley, D., Okely, A., Pearson, P., & Cotton, W.
Affiliations
  • Charles Sturt University (AU)
  • University of Wollongong (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Dudley, Dean
Venue
European Physical Education Review
Published
2011-10
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
353-378
ISSN
  • 1356-336X (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2749
OpenAlex
W2168033399
Cited by
176
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Physical Education Review (publishedVersion)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Children's Physical and Motor Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
physical education intervention, school sports, physical activity participation, enjoyment of physical activity, children and adolescents, direct instruction, teacher professional development, intervention effectiveness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review