Cited by 52Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationTechnology Use by Older AdultsChronic Disease Management Strategies

The effect of telehealth versus usual care for home-care patients with long-term conditions: a systematic review, meta-analysis and qualitative synthesis

Open access
McFarland, Sophie, Coufopolous, Anne, Lycett, Deborah·2021·Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Abstract

Introduction: Approximately 26 million people in the United Kingdom are living with one long-term condition and 10 million are living with two or more; these figures are projected to continue increasing (NHS England 2018). People with long-term conditions are two to three times more likely to have poor psychological wellbeing and utilise 50% of GP appointments, 64% of outpatient appointments and over 70 of inpatient bed days. Research in this population could help with increasing constraints on healthcare budgets and resources. Technology-enabled healthcare in the community might help improve quality of life and reduce healthcare costs of managing chronic disease but the overall impact is unclear, we therefore conducted a systematic review. Methods: Keywords and MeSH terms were used to search MEDLINE and CINAHL. We included qualitative and quantitative studies that reported on adult home-care patients diagnosed with at least one long-term condition, comparing telehealth to usual home care. Meta-analyses and sensitivity analyses were conducted using RevMan 5. Qualitative findings were thematically synthesised and reported narratively. Results: In total, 2568 studies were identified and nine (2611 participants) were included. Telehealth was not statistically significantly different versus standard home care for quality of life, psychological wellbeing, physical function, anxiety, depression, disease specific outcomes or bed days of care at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Qualitative findings showed patients found telehealth was beneficial for providing peace of mind and legitimising access to healthcare. Conclusion: Telehealth may offer reassurance to those living in the community with long-term conditions; however, a lack of high-quality studies and heterogeneity between interventions makes conclusions difficult.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1357633x19862956

Cites

18 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Gorst, S, L., Coates, E., Armitage, C, J. (2015) "Its sort of a lifeline" Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease patients' experiences of home telehealth. Health Psychology © 2015 American Psychological Association 2016, Vol. 35, No. 1, 60-68 [online] available from http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=5&sid=4fb50752-f7e2-4291-88ac- 898bba32b3d3%40sessionmgr4008
  2. Krause, M, W. (2018) BMJ Best Practice; Chronic Kidney Disease [online] available from> https://bestpractice.bmj.com/topics/en-gb/84
  3. Matías-Guiu, J., García-Ramos, R. (2010) 'Editorial bias in scientific publications.' 2011;26(1):1-5 0213-4853X/$ [online] available from https://ac.els-cdn.com/S2173580811700013/1-s2.0- S2173580811700013-main.pdf?_tid=f49d213c-9cbe-45dd-b633- c1143fff1176&acdnat=1533644989_50771d7486db4106c9bd4a4d2b385676

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McFarland, S., Coufopolous, A., & Lycett, D.
Affiliations
Coventry University (GB)
Corresponding author
McFarland, Sophie
Venue
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
Published
2019-08-08
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
69-87
ISSN
  • 1357-633X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1109
OpenAlex
W2947113171
Cited by
52
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3
FWCI
0.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure (Coventry University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Pure (Coventry University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Coventry University
  • Interserve Healthcare
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
Keywords
telemedicine, home care, chronic disease, usual care, quality of life, psychological well-being, anxiety, depression, physical function, health care utilization, community-based care, patient experience
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Chronic Disease, United Kingdom, Home Care Services, Humans, Quality of Life, Telemedicine, Disease Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review