Cited by 35Digital Mental Health InterventionsIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

A systematic review of electronic mental health interventions for Indigenous youth: Results and recommendations

Toombs, Elaine, Kowatch, Kristy R, Dalicandro, Lauren, McConkey, Stephanie, Hopkins, Carol, Mushquash, Christopher J·2021·Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Abstract

Electronic health interventions involve health services delivered using the Internet and related communication technologies. These services can be particularly relevant for Indigenous populations who often have differential access to health-care services compared to general populations, especially within rural and remote areas. As the popularity of electronic health interventions grows, there is an increased need for evidence-based recommendations for the effective use of these technologies. The current study is a systematic review of peer-reviewed and available grey literature with the aim of understanding outcomes of electronic health interventions for mental health concerns among Indigenous people. Studies used electronic health technologies for substance use treatment or prevention, suicide prevention, parenting supports, goal setting and behaviour change and consultation services. Various technological platforms were used across interventions, with both novel and adapted intervention development. Most studies provided qualitative results, with fewer studies focusing on quantitative outcomes. Some preliminary results from the engagement of Indigenous individuals with electronic health services has been demonstrated, but further research is needed to confirm these results. Identified barriers and facilitators are identified from the reviewed literature. Recommendations for future development of electronic health interventions for Indigenous youth are provided.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1357633x19899231

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Toombs, E., Kowatch, K. R., Dalicandro, L., McConkey, S., Hopkins, C., & Mushquash, C. J.
Affiliations
  • Dilico Anishinabek Family Care (CA)
  • Lakehead University (CA)
  • Southwestern Ontario Aboriginal Health Access Centre (CA)
  • Thunderbird Partnership Foundation (CA)
  • Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre (CA)
Corresponding author
Toombs, Elaine
Venue
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
Published
2020-01-14
Volume
27
Issue
9
Pages
539-552
ISSN
  • 1357-633X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1109
OpenAlex
W3000199134
Cited by
35
References
42
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
digital health interventions, Indigenous youth, Indigenous mental health, addiction treatment, substance use prevention, suicide prevention, parenting support, goal setting, behavior change, consulting services, barriers and facilitators, technology engagement
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Electronics, Humans, Mental Health, Rural Population, Suicide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review