Cited by 159Migration, Health and TraumaRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchCultural Competency in Health Care

An Exploration of Psychological Well-being with Young Somali Refugee and Asylum-seeker Women

Whittaker, Sara, Hardy, Gillian, Lewis, Kathryn, Buchan, Linda·2005·Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

The aims of this study were to explore individual and collective understandings of psychological well-being among young Somali (black African Muslim) asylum-seeker or refugee women. Three groups and five individual semi-structured interviews were undertaken and themes were identified using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Themes included resilience and protection; identity and beliefs; and concealment, distancing and secrets; which reflected acculturation, Islamic and Somali cultures. Spirit possession was explored in relation to culture and religion, mental health, protection and treatment. The women ‘get on’, cope with life, and value support from family, services and religion. However, the pressures to navigate conflicting and changing cultural and religious positions, and to conceal distress, frustrate accessing support. The young Somali refugees’ understandings of mental health and psychological well-being provide an insight for clinicians into the complexities of approaching services for help, and developing shared understandings transculturally. Clinically, the findings raise the paradox of how Somali women value support, yet also value concealment and fear disclosures. The variation and tensions reflected in the data from a small number of women highlight the importance of not stereotyping refugees, but exploring their individual beliefs and providing a range of service options.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1359104505051210

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The additional complexities of pre- and post-migration stressors experienced by the Somali community as a less established community seeking asylum in the UK add to the difficulties of recruitment and of designing acceptable and accessible interventions.

    “The additional complexities of pre and post migration stressors experienced by the Somali community as a less established community, seeking asylum in the UK arguably add to the difficulties of recruitment and of designing acceptable and accessible interventions [48-50].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Whittaker, S., Hardy, G., Lewis, K., & Buchan, L.
Affiliations
  • Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Whittaker, Sara
Venue
Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Published
2005-04
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
177-196
ISSN
  • 1359-1045 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7021
OpenAlex
W2084388670
Cited by
159
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 9
FWCI
3.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
Keywords
psychological well-being, resilience, acculturation, Islamic culture, spirit possession, mental health perceptions, cultural and religious beliefs, help-seeking, family support, young women

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review