Cited by 16Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsCounseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics

Parents’ difficulties as co-therapists in CBT among non-responding youths with anxiety disorders: Parent and therapist experiences

Lundkvist-Houndoumadi, Irene, Thastum, Mikael, Nielsen, Klaus·2016·Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

No increased effect has been associated with parent involvement in cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for youths with anxiety disorders. The purpose of this study was to explore parent and therapist experiences of CBT among non-responding youths with anxiety disorders, with a primary focus on parent involvement in therapy. Interpretative phenomenological analysis was applied to 24 sets of semi-structured interviews with families and therapists of anxiety-disordered youths who had not profited from CBT with parental inclusion. From the superordinate theme parents’ difficulties acting as co-therapists, which emerged from the analyses, two master themes represented the perspectives of parents ( difficulty working together with the youth and feeling unqualified, with limited resources), and two represented the perspectives of therapists ( family dynamics stood in the way of progress and difficulty transferring control to parents). Parent and therapist experiences complemented each other, offering two different perspectives on parent difficulties as co-therapists. However, the two groups’ views on their respective roles in therapy were in conflict. Parents wished to remain being “just the parents” and for the experts to take over, while therapists wished to act as facilitators transferring the control to parents. Clinical implications are drawn for parental involvement and enhancement of treatment outcomes for likely non-responders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1359104515615641

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lundkvist-Houndoumadi, I., Thastum, M., & Nielsen, K.
Affiliations
  • Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University, Denmark
  • Aarhus University (DK)
Venue
Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Published
2015-11-27
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
477-490
ISSN
  • 1359-1045 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7021
OpenAlex
W2266241663
Cited by
16
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
Keywords
parent involvement in therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, youth anxiety disorders, parent-therapist relationship, family dynamics, parental resources, therapist experience, parental experiences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Parents, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review