CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 60

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An exploration of the perceptions and experiences of living with chronic anorexia nervosa while an inpatient on an Eating Disorders Unit: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) study

Fox, John RE, Diab, Pascal·2015·Journal of Health Psychology
DOI 10.1177/1359105313497526
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Chronic anorexia nervosa (cAN) is a challenging presentation for the clinician. Motivation to recover is low, and outcomes are often poor. Within this study. six participants, currently in treatment, were interviewed. These interview transcripts were analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. The results highlighted five superordinate themes resulted from the analysis and these referred to the following points: (1) ‘making sense of AN’, (2) ‘experience of treatment/treatment’, (3) ‘interpersonal relationships’, (4) ‘battling with anorexia’ and (5) ‘staff pessimism in the treatment of cAN’. These results highlighted how the self is entwined with anorexia nervosa and thus making it incredibly difficult to perceive a life without cAN.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1359105313497526

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. American Psychiatric Association (APA), 1994, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV)
  2. 10.1002/erv.813 · DOI
  3. 10.1002/9781118328910.ch26 · DOI
  4. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-108X(200007)28:1<20::AID-EAT3>3.0.CO;2-X · DOI
  5. 10.1348/014466509X454598 · DOI
  6. 10.1177/1359105311435946 · DOI
  7. 10.1002/eat.20085 · DOI
  8. 10.1177/1359105311419270 · DOI
  9. 10.1080/106402602753573531 · DOI
  10. 10.1002/eat.20276 · DOI
  11. 10.1002/cpp.794 · DOI
  12. 10.1348/014466505X53902 · DOI
  13. Smith J, 2004, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1, 39
  14. 10.4135/9781446217870.n14 · DOI
  15. Smith JA, 2004, Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research
  16. 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.8.1284 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1002/eat.20557 · DOI
  18. 10.1348/147608309X480172 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/S0006-3223(03)00172-0 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Fox, J. R., & Diab, P.
Venue
Journal of Health Psychology
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2013-08-09
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
27-36
ISSN
  • 1359-1053
  • 1461-7277
DOI
10.1177/1359105313497526
Cited by
60
References
1
Language
en
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review