Cited by 22Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionCancer survivorship and care

Do gender, anxiety, or sleep quality predict mindfulness-based stress reduction outcomes?

Open access
Brown, Megan M, Arigo, Danielle, Wolever, Ruth Q, Smoski, Moria J, Hall, Martica H, Brantley, Jeffrey G, Greeson, Jeffrey M·2021·Journal of Health Psychology

Abstract

Although mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) can improve health and well-being, less is known about factors that predict outcomes. This prospective observational study examined gender and baseline anxiety and sleep quality as predictors of change in emotion regulation and stress symptoms following an 8-week MBSR program. Women and men reported similar improvement in stress symptoms and cognitive reappraisal, whereas men improved more in emotion suppression. Individuals with higher anxiety and worse sleep pre-treatment benefited most in terms of decreased stress. Evaluating pre-treatment characteristics could help determine optimal candidates for MBSR training, and could optimize outcomes for both women and men.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1359105320931186

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The evidence on such predictors is mixed and may depend on sample characteristics, follow-up length, and other design features.

    “but the evidence is mixed5,6,55,81 and may be influenced by study sample characteristics, length of follow-up, and other study design features.28,56”

    From Moderators and Nonspecific Predictors of Treatment Benefits in a Randomized Trial of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction vs Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy vs Usual Care for Chronic Low Back Pain (2023) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Gender differences in MBSR response section says predictor findings need replication across studies, populations, and outcomes. The Strengths, limitations, and future directions section identifies sample composition and design limitations. These passages support the possibility that findings vary with sample and design, but the paper does not link that variation to length of follow-up. No page numbers were provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brown, M. M., Arigo, D., Wolever, R. Q., Smoski, M. J., Hall, M. H., Brantley, J. G., & Greeson, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Rowan University (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Greeson, Jeffrey M
Venue
Journal of Health Psychology
Published
2020-06-03
Volume
26
Issue
13
Pages
2656-2662
ISSN
  • 1359-1053 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7277
OpenAlex
W3029015627
Cited by
22
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K23 MH087754)
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (K99 AT004945)
  • Fannie E. Rippel Foundation (Research infrastructure grant.)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
mindfulness-based stress reduction, predictors of treatment outcome, gender differences, anxiety, sleep quality, emotion regulation, cognitive reappraisal, emotional suppression, stress symptoms
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Sleep, Stress, Psychological, Treatment Outcome, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review