Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance
Abstract
This paper examines the effects of planning and post-task activity on task-based performance. It is motivated by the need, given recent claims that task-based instruction has desirable pedagogic qualities, to investigate the effects of choosing different types of tasks, as well as different task implementation conditions, on the fluency, accuracy and complexity of the language which is produced when tasks are carried out. Three tasks are investigated: a personal task, a narrative task and a decision task. A 2-by-2 research design was used, with two planning conditions (10 minutes' planning time vs no planning time) and two post-task conditions (plus or minus knowledge of a post-task). Performance was assessed through the number of pauses (as a measure of fluency), the percentage of error-free clauses (to measure accuracy) and the level of subordination (as a measure of complexity). Confirming hypotheses and previous research, planning had clear effects on almost all measures. The hypothesis that foreknowledge of a post-task activity would selectively influence accuracy received only partial confirmation. Data from the present study was also related to results reported in an earlier study. This revealed that there is strong evidence of trade-off effects between the different dependent variables used, in that fluency, accuracy and complexity seem to enter into competition with one another, given the limited attentional capacities of second language users. Finally, there are indications that task characteristics interact with planning time and lead to selective improvements in particular areas. Tasks which contain clearer inherent structure, when planned, seem to favour accuracy, whereas tasks which require more on-line processing or which have complex outcomes, when planned, produce greater complexity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Skehan and Foster (1997) found improvement in accuracy when learners faced the threat of a public performance as a post-task activity.
“Skehan and Foster (1997) investigated the effects of the 'threat' of a public performance, as a post-task activity, and indeed found improvement in accuracy.”
From Focus on form through task repetition in TBLT (2016) · cites this paper as Skehan and Foster (1997)
Cites
The Influence of Planning and Task Type on Second Language Performance
Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263100015047 · Cited by 1,147 · cited 10× · see citing works
“In addition, Foster and Skehan (1996) found that providing subjects with guidance for pre-task planning was associated with greater complexity of language during the task, while unguided planning favoured accuracy.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationThree Approaches to Task-Based Syllabus Design
Long, M. H., & Crookes, G. (1992) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587368 · Cited by 866 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners
Kormos, J., & Dénes (2004) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2004.01.001 · Cited by 679 · see citing works
The influence of source of planning and focus of planning on task-based performance
Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1999) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1191/136216899672186140 · Cited by 342 · see citing works
Self-citationExploring the benefits of task repetition and recycling for classroom language learning
Lynch, T., & Maclean, J. (2000) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/136216880000400303 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
Wang, Z. (2014) · Task-Based Language Teaching · doi:10.1075/tblt.5.02wan · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Repeating a Monologue Under Increasing Time Pressure: Effects on Fluency, Complexity, and Accuracy
Thai, C., & Boers, F. (2016) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/tesq.232 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Turnbull, B. (2019) · Bilingual Research Journal · doi:10.1080/15235882.2019.1589603 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Focus on form through task repetition in TBLT
van de Guchte, M., Braaksma, M., Rijlaarsdam, G., & Bimmel, P. (2016) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168815609616 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
The Quantity and Quality of Language Practice in Typical Interactive Pair/Group Tasks
Collins, L., & White, J. (2015) · TESL Canada Journal · doi:10.18806/tesl.v31i0.1186 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Skehan, P., & Foster, P.
- Affiliations
- University of West London (GB)
- Venue
- Language Teaching Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1997-09
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 185-211
- ISSN
- 1362-1688 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0954
- OpenAlex
- W2129999062
- Cited by
- 723
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 38 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 64 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 34
- FWCI
- 42.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Language Teaching Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Second Language Learning and Teaching
- Keywords
- task-based language teaching, task planning, fluency, accuracy, subordination, task complexity, trade-off effect, second language production, task type, planning time, attentional capacity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review