Cited by 723EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Acquisition and LearningSecond Language Learning and Teaching

Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance

Skehan, Peter, Foster, Pauline·1997·Language Teaching Research

Abstract

This paper examines the effects of planning and post-task activity on task-based performance. It is motivated by the need, given recent claims that task-based instruction has desirable pedagogic qualities, to investigate the effects of choosing different types of tasks, as well as different task implementation conditions, on the fluency, accuracy and complexity of the language which is produced when tasks are carried out. Three tasks are investigated: a personal task, a narrative task and a decision task. A 2-by-2 research design was used, with two planning conditions (10 minutes' planning time vs no planning time) and two post-task conditions (plus or minus knowledge of a post-task). Performance was assessed through the number of pauses (as a measure of fluency), the percentage of error-free clauses (to measure accuracy) and the level of subordination (as a measure of complexity). Confirming hypotheses and previous research, planning had clear effects on almost all measures. The hypothesis that foreknowledge of a post-task activity would selectively influence accuracy received only partial confirmation. Data from the present study was also related to results reported in an earlier study. This revealed that there is strong evidence of trade-off effects between the different dependent variables used, in that fluency, accuracy and complexity seem to enter into competition with one another, given the limited attentional capacities of second language users. Finally, there are indications that task characteristics interact with planning time and lead to selective improvements in particular areas. Tasks which contain clearer inherent structure, when planned, seem to favour accuracy, whereas tasks which require more on-line processing or which have complex outcomes, when planned, produce greater complexity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/136216889700100302

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Skehan and Foster (1997) found improvement in accuracy when learners faced the threat of a public performance as a post-task activity.

    “Skehan and Foster (1997) investigated the effects of the 'threat' of a public performance, as a post-task activity, and indeed found improvement in accuracy.”

    From Focus on form through task repetition in TBLT (2016) · cites this paper as Skehan and Foster (1997)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Skehan, P., & Foster, P.
Affiliations
University of West London (GB)
Venue
Language Teaching Research
Published
1997-09
Volume
1
Issue
3
Pages
185-211
ISSN
  • 1362-1688 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0954
OpenAlex
W2129999062
Cited by
723
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 64 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 34
FWCI
42.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Language Teaching Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Second Language Learning and Teaching
Keywords
task-based language teaching, task planning, fluency, accuracy, subordination, task complexity, trade-off effect, second language production, task type, planning time, attentional capacity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review