Cited by 8EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Acquisition and LearningLinguistics and Language Analysis

The Quantity and Quality of Language Practice in Typical Interactive Pair/Group Tasks

Open access
Collins, Laura, White, Joanna·2015·TESL Canada Journal

Abstract

This article reports on a study examining the language practice opportunities that occurred during a range of paired and small group interactive tasks in an intensive English as a Second Language (ESL) class of francophone Grade 6 students. The analysis focussed on the opportunities the tasks provided for the use of two complex and challenging forms (the simple past and the possessive determiners his/her) by these learners. We examined both the quantity and the quality of the contexts for the two target forms within the tasks, and whether particular task types or task features were associated with more or richer practice for the forms.Cet article fait rapport d’une étude qui examine les occasions de pratiquer la langue qui se sont présentées pendant diverses tâches interactives accomplies en petits groupes dans un cours intensif d’anglais langue seconde avec des étudiants francophones en 6e année. L’analyse a porté sur les occasions présentées aux apprenant pendant les tâches pour employer deux formes complexes et difficiles (le passé simple et les déterminants possessifs « his » et « hers »). Nous avons examiné tant la quantité que la qualité des contextes pour les deux formes ciblées, ainsi que les différentes sortes de tâches pour déterminer si elles étaient liées à un emploi plus riche ou fréquent des formes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18806/tesl.v31i0.1186

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Collins & White (2014) analysed classroom interaction of Grade 6 ESL learners in Quebec and discovered that certain features (e.g. possessive determiners) were more difficult to elicit even when the task was designed to do so (e.g. talking about family members).

    “Collins & White (2014) analysed classroom interaction of Grade 6 ESL learners in Quebec and discovered that certain features (e.g.possessive determiners) were more difficult to elicit even when the task was designed to do so (e.g.talking about family members).”

    From Interaction and instructed second language acquisition (2018) · cites this paper as Collins & White 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 58 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Collins, L., & White, J.
Venue
TESL Canada Journal
Published
2015-01-21
Volume
31
Pages
47
ISSN
  • 0826-435X (ISSN-L)
  • 1925-8917
OpenAlex
W1905125945
Cited by
8
References
58
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
13.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
TESL Canada Journal (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministère de l'Éducation, du Loisir et du Sport Québec
  • Concordia University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
Keywords
task-based language learning, simple past tense, French-speaking learners, English as a second language, task design, target language use

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review