Cited by 42Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesFamily and Disability Support Research

Comparison of a broad-based screen versus disorder-specific screen in detecting young children with an autism spectrum disorder

Open access
Wiggins, Lisa D, Piazza, Vivian, Robins, Diana L·2014·Autism

Abstract

The goals of our study were to (a) compare agreement between autism spectrum disorder diagnosis and outcome of the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers and Parents Evaluation of Developmental Status in a sample of toddlers and (b) examine specific concerns noted for toddlers who screened negative on the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers or Parents Evaluation of Developmental Status but were later diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. Participants were administered the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers and Parents Evaluation of Developmental Status during well-child visits. Families were invited for a clinical evaluation if autism spectrum disorder symptoms were noted on the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers and Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers Follow-Up Interview or if autism spectrum disorder concerns were noted by the pediatrician. Fifty-two children completed the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, Parents Evaluation of Developmental Status, and a clinical evaluation, and 30 of these children were diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder. Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers results showed higher agreement with autism spectrum disorder diagnosis than any individual Parents Evaluation of Developmental Status screen result, although the latter detected many children with other developmental concerns. Children who screened negative on the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers or Parents Evaluation of Developmental Status but were diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder had concerns noted in sensory response and proto-declarative pointing that can be considered in the context of screen results. In sum, our findings support universal autism spectrum disorder–specific screening in addition to general developmental screening and offer considerations to encourage early identification of toddlers with autism spectrum disorder.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1362361312466962

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • General developmental screening aids in identifying children with any developmental delays including autism, but autism-specific screening identifies some children with autism who screened negative on a developmental screener.

    “While general developmental screening aids in identifying children with any developmental delays including autism, autism-specific screening identifies some children with autism who screened negative on a developmental screener (Hardy et al., 2015; Wiggins et al., 2012).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [17]Glascoe F Collaborating with parents: Using Parents’ Evaluation of Developmental Status in Screening, Surveillance, and Promotion Nashville, TN Ellsworth & Vandermeer Press 1998

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wiggins, L. D., Piazza, V., & Robins, D. L.
Affiliations
Georgia State University (US)
Venue
Autism
Published
2012-12-21
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
76-84
ISSN
  • 1362-3613 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7005
OpenAlex
W2169296484
Cited by
42
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Autism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Georgia State University
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD039961)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, autism screening, toddlers, M-CHAT, Parents' Evaluation of Developmental Status, developmental screening, early detection, diagnostic agreement, sensory responses, developmental difficulties
MeSH terms
Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Mass Screening, Psychometrics, Sensitivity and Specificity, Checklist

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review