Cited by 88Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchHealth Education and ValidationPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Using qualitative methods to guide scale development for anxiety in youth with autism spectrum disorder

Bearss, Karen, Taylor, Christopher A, Aman, Michael G, Whittemore, Robin, Lecavalier, Luc, Miller, Judith, Pritchett, Jill, Green, Bryson +1 more·2016·Autism

Abstract

Anxiety is common in youth with autism spectrum disorder. Despite this common co-occurrence, studies targeting anxiety in this population are hindered by the under-developed state of measures in youth with autism spectrum disorder. Content validity (the extent to which an instrument measures the domain of interest) and an instrument's relevance to the patient population are key components of measurement development. This article describes the application of qualitative research methods in the initial development of a parent-rated instrument of anxiety symptoms in youth with autism spectrum disorder. Overall, 48 parents of 45 children (aged 3-17 years) with autism spectrum disorder and at least mild anxiety participated in one of six focus groups at two sites (three groups per site). Systematic coding of the focus group transcripts identified broad themes reflecting the situations and events that trigger anxiety in children with autism spectrum disorder, the behavioral manifestations of anxiety in children with autism spectrum disorder, the parent and the child's own response to anxiety, and broad behavioral patterns that could be associated with anxiety. From the focus group data, investigators generated 52 candidate items for a parent-rating of anxiety in youth with autism spectrum disorder. This report provides a detailed description of these early steps in developing a patient-oriented outcome measure.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1362361315601012

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research has explored ways in which neurodivergent people have described their fit-for purpose, personal ways of coping with stress and distress.

    “We can learn from research that has explored ways in which neurodivergent people have described their fit-for purpose, personal ways of coping with stress and distress (Young, 2012; Bearss et al., 2016; Petty et al., 2022).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bearss, K., Taylor, C. A., Aman, M. G., Whittemore, R., Lecavalier, L., Miller, J., Pritchett, J., Green, B., & Scahill, L.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Scahill, Lawrence
Venue
Autism
Published
2015-09-22
Volume
20
Issue
6
Pages
663-672
ISSN
  • 1362-3613 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7005
OpenAlex
W2291678689
Cited by
88
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Autism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH099021)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, anxiety, youth, scale development, content validity, anxiety triggers, focus groups
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Adolescent, Anxiety Disorders, Child, Child, Preschool, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Female, Humans, Male, Reproducibility of Results, Focus Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review