Cited by 62Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Psychometric analysis of the Systematic Observation of Red Flags for autism spectrum disorder in toddlers.

Open access
Dow, Deanna, Guthrie, Whitney, Stronach, Sheri T, Wetherby, Amy M·2017·Autism

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the utility of the Systematic Observation of Red Flags as an observational level-two screening measure to detect risk for autism spectrum disorder in toddlers when used with a video-recorded administration of the Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales. Psychometric properties of the Systematic Observation of Red Flags were examined in a sample of 247 toddlers of 16- to 24 months old: 130 with autism spectrum disorder, 61 with developmental delays, and 56 typically developing. Individual items were examined for performance to create an algorithm with improved sensitivity and specificity, yielding a total Composite score and Domain scores for Social Communication and Restricted Repetitive Behaviors. Codes indicating clear symptom presence were collapsed to yield a count of the number of Red Flags for the overall scale and each symptom domain. Results indicated significant group differences with large effects for the Composite, both Domain scores, and Red Flags score, and good discrimination (area under the curve = 0.84–0.87) between autism spectrum disorder and nonspectrum groups for the Composite, Social Communication Domain, and Social Communication Red Flags score. The Systematic Observation of Red Flags provides an observational screening measure for 16- to 24-month-olds with good discrimination, sensitivity, and specificity. A cutoff of 20 on the Composite is recommended to optimally detect autism spectrum disorder risk.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1362361316636760

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Sparrow SS Cicchetti DV Balla DA 2005 Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (Vineland II), Survey Interview Form/Caregiver Rating Form Livonia, MN Pearson Assessments

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dow, D., Guthrie, W., Stronach, S. T., & Wetherby, A. M.
Affiliations
  • Florida State University (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Dow, Deanna
Venue
Autism
Published
2016-07-09
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
301-309
ISSN
  • 1362-3613 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7005
OpenAlex
W2343483041
Cited by
62
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Autism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U01DD000304)
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC007462)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD065272, R01HD078410)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, toddlers, red flags, social communication, restricted and repetitive behaviors, developmental delay, screening cut-off values, sensitivity and specificity
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Child Behavior, Child, Preschool, Humans, Infant, Psychological Tests, Psychometrics, Risk Factors, Sensitivity and Specificity, Video Recording, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review