Cited by 524Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentAction Observation and Synchronization

Autistic peer-to-peer information transfer is highly effective

Open access
Crompton, Catherine J, Ropar, Danielle, Evans-Williams, Claire VM, Flynn, Emma G, Fletcher-Watson, Sue·2020·Autism

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Effective information transfer requires social communication skills. As autism is clinically defined by social communication deficits, it may be expected that information transfer between autistic people would be particularly deficient. However, the Double Empathy theory would suggest that communication difficulties arise from a mismatch in neurotype; and thus information transfer between autistic people may be more successful than information transfer between an autistic and a non-autistic person. We investigate this by examining information transfer between autistic adults, non-autistic adults and mixed autistic-with-non-autistic pairs. Initial participants were told a story which they recounted to a second participant, who recounted the story to a third participant and so on, along a ‘diffusion chain’ of eight participants ( n = 72). We found a significantly steeper decline in detail retention in the mixed chains, while autistic chains did not significantly differ from non-autistic chains. Participant rapport ratings revealed significantly lower scores for mixed chains. These results challenge the diagnostic criterion that autistic people lack the skills to interact successfully. Rather, autistic people effectively share information with each other. Information transfer selectively degrades more quickly in mixed pairs, in parallel with a reduction in rapport. Lay abstract: Sharing information with other people relies on the ability to communicate well. Autism is defined clinically by deficits in social communication. It may therefore be expected that autistic people find it difficult to share information with other people. We wanted to find out whether this was the case, and whether it was different when autistic people were sharing information with other autistic people or with non-autistic people. We recruited nine groups, each with eight people. In three of the groups, everyone was autistic; in three of the groups, everyone was non-autistic; and three of the groups were mixed groups where half the group was autistic and half the group was non-autistic. We told one person in each group a story and asked them to share it with another person, and for that person to share it again and so on, until everyone in the group had heard the story. We then looked at how many details of the story had been shared at each stage. We found that autistic people share information with other autistic people as well as non-autistic people do with other non-autistic people. However, when there are mixed groups of autistic and non-autistic people, much less information is shared. Participants were also asked how they felt they had got on with the other person in the interaction. The people in the mixed groups also experienced lower rapport with the person they were sharing the story with. This finding is important as it shows that autistic people have the skills to share information well with one another and experience good rapport, and that there are selective problems when autistic and non-autistic people are interacting.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1362361320919286

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Certain types of communication, including information sharing, can be more successful within same-neurotype than cross-neurotype pairs.

    “Furthermore, certain types of communication, including information sharing, can be more successful within same-neurotype than cross-neurotype pairs (Crompton et al., 2020).”

    From Compassionate pedagogy for neurodiversity in higher education: A conceptual analysis (2023) · cites this paper as Crompton et al., 2020

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Baron-Cohen S. O’Riordan M. Stone V. Jones R. (1999). Recognition of faux pas by normally developing children and children with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29, 407– 418. 10587887
  2. Bourgeois P. Hess U. (2008). The impact of social context on mimicry. Biological Psychology, 77, 343– 352. 18164534
  3. DeBrabander K. M. Morrison K. E. Jones D. R. Faso D. J. Chmielewski M. Sasson N. J. (2019). Do first impressions of autistic adults differ between autistic and nonautistic observers? Autism in Adulthood, 1(4), 250– 257. PMC8992824 36601322
  4. Flesch R. (1948). A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32, 221– 233. 18867058
  5. Gernsbacher M. A. Stevenson J. L. Dern S. (2017). Specificity, contexts, and reference groups matter when assessing autistic traits. PLOS ONE, 12(2), Article e0171931. PMC5305234 28192464
  6. Heasman B. Gillespie A. (2019b). Participants over-estimate how helpful they are in a two-player game scenario toward an artificial confederate that discloses a diagnosis of autism. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 1349. PMC6579835 31244739
  7. Kass R. E. Raftery A. E. (1995). Bayes factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 773– 795.
  8. Kirkovski M. Enticott P. G. Fitzgerald P. B. (2013). A review of the role of female gender in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43(11), 2584– 2603. 23525974
  9. Mesoudi A. Whiten A. (2008). The multiple roles of cultural transmission experiments in understanding human cultural evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363, 3489– 3501. PMC2607337 18801720
  10. Morrison K. E. DeBrabander K. M. Jones D. R. Faso D. J. Ackerman R. A. Sasson N. J. (2019). Outcomes of real-world social interaction for autistic adults paired with autistic compared to typically developing partners. Autism. 10.1177/1362361319892701 31823656 · DOI
  11. Ritvo R. Ritvo E. Guthrie D. Ritvo M. Hufnagel D. H. McMahon W.... Eloff J. (2011). The Ritvo Autism Asperger Diagnostic Scale-Revised (RAADS-R): A scale to assist the diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder in adults: An international validation study. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41, 1076– 1089. 21086033 PMC3134766
  12. Rutherford M. Baron-Cohen S. (2002). Reading the mind in the voice: A study with normal adults and adults with Asperger syndrome and high functioning autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32, 189– 194. 12108620
  13. Sasson N. J. Morrison K. E. (2017). First impressions of adults with autism improve with diagnostic disclosure and increased autism knowledge of peers. Autism, 23, 50– 59. 29039208
  14. Wechsler D. (2011). WASI-II: Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (2nd ed.). Psychological Corporation.
  15. Wood L. A. Kendal R. L. Flynn E. G. (2013). Whom do children copy? Model-based biases in social learning. Developmental Review, 33, 341– 356.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crompton, C. J., Ropar, D., Evans-Williams, C. V., Flynn, E. G., & Fletcher-Watson, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • The Autism Academy, UK
  • Queen's University Belfast (GB)
  • The University of Edinburgh, UK
Corresponding author
Crompton, Catherine J
Venue
Autism
Published
2020-05-20
Volume
24
Issue
7
Pages
1704-1712
ISSN
  • 1362-3613 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7005
OpenAlex
W3026879779
Cited by
524
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 115 · 2025: 113 · 2024: 97 · 2023: 81 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 1
FWCI
26.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Autism (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (acceptedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Templeton World Charity Foundation (TWCF0200)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
social communication, story recall, rapport, autistic adults, social interaction difficulties, information sharing
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Autistic Disorder, Communication, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Peer Group

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review