Cited by 229Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentFace Recognition and Perception

How Easy is it to Read the Minds of People with Autism Spectrum Disorder?

Open access
Sheppard, Elizabeth, Pillai, Dhanya, Wong, Genevieve Tze-Lynn, Ropar, Danielle, Mitchell, Peter·2016·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Abstract

How well can neurotypical adults' interpret mental states in people with ASD? 'Targets' (ASD and neurotypical) reactions to four events were video-recorded then shown to neurotypical participants whose task was to identify which event the target had experienced. In study 1 participants were more successful for neurotypical than ASD targets. In study 2, participants rated ASD targets equally expressive as neurotypical targets for three of the events, while in study 3 participants gave different verbal descriptions of the reactions of ASD and neurotypical targets. It thus seems people with ASD react differently but not less expressively to events. Because neurotypicals are ineffective in interpreting the behaviour of those with ASD, this could contribute to the social difficulties in ASD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10803-015-2662-8

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nonautistic people have difficulties understanding the minds and behaviours of autistic people and are prone to misperceiving them.

    “What such research shows is that nonautistic people have difficulties understanding the minds and behaviours of autistic people – and, worryingly, are prone to misperceiving them.”
  • Nonautistic people have difficulties interpreting autistic people's behaviour.

    “have difficulties interpreting autistic people’s behaviour (Sheppard, Pillai, Wong, Ropar, & Mitchell, 2016) and mental states (Edey et al., 2016).”

    From Annual Research Review: Shifting from ‘normal science’ to neurodiversity in autism science (2022) · cites this paper as Sheppard, Pillai, Wong, Ropar, & Mitchell, 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sheppard, E., Pillai, D., Wong, G. T.-L., Ropar, D., & Mitchell, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus (MY)
Corresponding author
Sheppard, Elizabeth
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2015-11-24
Volume
46
Issue
4
Pages
1247-1254
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
OpenAlex
W2175842555
Cited by
229
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bradford Scholars (University of Bradford) (submittedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, theory of mind, social cognition, facial expressions, emotional expression
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Adolescent, Emotions, Facial Expression, Humans, Male, Nonverbal Communication, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review