Cited by 14Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFamily and Disability Support ResearchBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Neuro-affirmative support for autism, the double empathy problem and monotropism

Open access
Brosnan, Mark, Camilleri, Louis John·2025·Frontiers in Psychiatry

Abstract

Conceptualising autism within a neurodiversity approach raises fundamental questions regarding the nature of the goals pursued in autism support and who is responsible for achieving these goals. The Double Empathy Problem considers deficits in social communication as residing between autistic and non-autistic communicators, rather than solely within the autistic individual. This is important as autistic individuals can have different perceptions of what appropriate goals for autism support should be, when compared to (non-autistic) family, friends and professionals. Monotropism highlights the importance of engaging with the interests of the autistic individual when considering support. This perspective considers the extent to which autistic individuals can self-set and self-achieve autism support goals? Social narratives have a specific goal and explicit description of how to achieve this goal and what the outcome of achieving the goal will be. The Stories Online For Autism app (SOFA-app.com) develops and delivers social narratives for autistic individuals. The SOFA-app has proven to be highly acceptable and effective in supporting autistic individuals. Initially our research focussed on family, friends and professionals developing autism support for autistic children. Subsequently we extended this methodology to explore the self-set goals of autistic adults and children as well as capacity to self-achieve these goals successfully. Digital support for the development and delivery of social narratives to support self-set goals for autistic individuals is recommended. Addressing the Double Empathy Problem and supporting self-set goals are also considered alongside the implications of preferences associated with Monotropism to argue this approach can be considered neuro-affirmative.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1538875

Cites

55 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [24]Lawson WB. Autism and Being Monotropic: What Medical and Other Practitioners Need to Know. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore (2025).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brosnan, M., & Camilleri, L. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Bath (GB)
  • University of Malta (MT)
Corresponding author
Brosnan, Mark
Venue
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Published
2025-03-13
Volume
16
Pages
1538875-1538875
ISSN
1664-0640 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4408417644
Cited by
14
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 5
FWCI
7.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, double empathy problem, monotropism, neurodiversity, social narratives, self-set goals, autism support, digital support, autistic adults, children with autism, social communication deficits

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review