CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 225Social and Intergroup PsychologyTeam Dynamics and PerformanceSocial Power and Status Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 99 of the 99 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

‘Social Sharedness’ as a Unifying Theme for Information Processing in Groups

Tindale, R. Scott, Kameda, Tatsuya·2000·Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
DOI 10.1177/1368430200003002002
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Although much of the research on small groups in social psychology has emphasized cognitive, information-processing tasks (decision-making and problem solving), only recently have groups been conceptualized as information-processing systems. Partially due to this new conceptualization, group research is on the rise, yet much of this research is discipline specific. Few attempts have been made to integrate this research to provide common themes or frameworks across disciplinary boundaries. We propose that one potential unifying theme underlying much of the recent research on groups is ‘social sharedness’: the degree to which cognitions, preferences, identities, etc. are shared and are being shared within groups. Through a targeted review of the literature, we attempt to demonstrate that social sharedness is central to understanding group decision-making, provides a tie between past and current group research, and can serve a unifying function for future endeavors.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1368430200003002002

Cites

99 of 99 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Brauner, E., Nags Head Conference on Groups, Networks, and Organizations
  2. Davis, J. H., 1996, Understanding group behavior: Consensual action by small groups, 35
  3. Gigone, D., 1996, Understanding group behavior: Consensual action by small groups, 221
  4. Hinsz, V. B., Society of Experimental Social Psychologists Pre-Conference on Small Groups
  5. Hogg, M. A., 1996, Understanding group behavior: Small group processes and interpersonal relations, 227
  6. Janis, I., 1982, Groupthink
  7. Latané, B., 1996, Understanding group behavior: Consensual action by small groups, 193
  8. Laughlin, P. R., 1980, Progress in social psychology, 127
  9. Moreland, R. L., 1998, Social psychological applications to social issues: Applications of theory and research on groups, 37
  10. Sawyer, J. E., Society of Judgment and Decision Making Annual Meeting
  11. Sheffey, S., Midwestern Psychological Association Annual Convention
  12. Smith, C. M., Amsterdam Conference on Minority Influence
  13. Thompson, L., 96th Annual Meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association
  14. Tindale, R. S., 1993, Individual and group decision making: Current issues, 109
  15. Tindale, R. S., 1998, Social psychological applications to social issues: Applications of theory and research on groups, 1
  16. Tindale, R. S., Society for Judgment and Decision Making Meetings
  17. Tindale, R. S., Society for Judgment and Decision Making Meetings
  18. Tindale, R. S., Nags Head Conference on Groups, Networks, and Organizations
  19. Tindale, R. S., Annual Meeting of the Society for Judgment and Decision Making
  20. Tindale, R. S., 1996, Understanding group behavior: Consensual action by small groups, 81
  21. Turner, J. C., 1985, Advances in group processes: Theory and research, 518
  22. Wood, W., Amsterdam Conference on Minority Influence

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 225

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Tindale, R. S., & Kameda, T.
Affiliations
  • Loyola University Chicago (US)
  • Hokkaido University (JP)
ORCID
Venue
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2000-04
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
123-140
ISSN
  • 1368-4302 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7188
DOI
10.1177/1368430200003002002
OpenAlex
W1967353079
Cited by
225
References
96
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
FWCI
23.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
Keywords
small groups, group decision making, group problem solving, shared cognition, shared preferences, group identity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review