CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 215Social and Intergroup PsychologyRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchSocial Power and Status Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Changing Interracial Evaluations and Behavior: The Effects of a Common Group Identity

Nier, Jason A., Gaertner, Samuel L., Dovidio, John F., Banker, Brenda S., Ward, Christine M., Rust, Mary C.·2001·Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
DOI 10.1177/1368430201004004001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Two studies examined whether developing a common ingroup identity among Blacks and Whites can improve Whites’ interracial evaluations. In Study 1, White participants interacted with a Black or White confederate under conditions designed to produce cognitive representations as fellow group members or as separate individuals. Consistent with the Common Ingroup Identity Model, Whites evaluated Blacks more favorably when they interacted with them as members of the same group than as separate individuals. Study 2, conducted as fans entered a football stadium, revealed that Whites complied more frequently with a Black interviewer’s request to interview them when they shared common university affiliation, relative to when the Black interviewer was affiliated with the opposing team.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1368430201004004001

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 63 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Bachman, B. A. (1993). An intergroup model of organizational mergers . Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Delaware, Newark, DE.
  2. Brown, R. J., 1981, Intergroup behavior, 33
  3. Dechamps, J. C., 1978, Differentiation between social groups, 141
  4. Dovidio, J. F., 1996, Foundations of stereotypes and stereotyping, 337
  5. Gaertner, S. L., 1986, Prejudice, discrimination, and racism, 315
  6. Hewstone, M., 1996, Foundations of stereotypes and stereotyping, 323
  7. Katz, I., 1981, Stigma: A modern social psychological analysis
  8. Schofield, J. W., 1986, Prejudice, discrimination, and racism, 231
  9. Tajfel, H., 1979, Intergroup behavior, 66
  10. Williams, R. M., 1947, The reduction of intergroup tensions (Bulletin 57)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–214 of 214

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Nier, J. A., Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Banker, B. S., Ward, C. M., & Rust, M. C.
Affiliations
  • Connecticut College (US)
  • University of Delaware (US)
  • Colgate University (US)
  • American International College (US)
Corresponding author
Nier, Jason A.
ORCID
Dovidio, John F.
Venue
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2001-10
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
299-316
ISSN
  • 1368-4302 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7188
DOI
10.1177/1368430201004004001
OpenAlex
W2028868182
Cited by
215
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
FWCI
9.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
Keywords
common ingroup identity model, interracial attitudes, interracial contact, common ingroup identity, black-white relations, mental representation, university affiliation, football fans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review