Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 330

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reliability and validity of self-reported physical activity in the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study — HUNT 1

Kurtze, Nanna, Rangul, Vegar, Hustvedt, Bo-Egil, Flanders, W Dana·2008·Scandinavian Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Background: A large health survey was previously conducted in 1984—86, the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT 1), and another was conducted in 1995—97 (HUNT 2). A third, HUNT 3, started in 2006. However, the physical activity (PA) questionnaires have not yet been validated. Aims: To assess the reliability and validity of the self-reported physical activity questionnaire in the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT 1). Methods: The HUNT 1 questionnaire was administered to a random sample of 108 healthy men aged 20—39 years. Repeatability was assessed with a repeat questionnaire after one week, and validity by comparing results with direct measurement of VO 2 during maximal work on a treadmill, with ActiReg, an instrument that measures PA and energy expenditure (EE) and with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). ActiReg records the main body positions (stand, sit, bent forward and lie) together with the motion of the trunk and/or one leg each second. Results: The results indicated strong, significant agreement on test—retest (weighted kappa frequency, r=0.80, intensity, r=0.82, and duration, r=0.69). We found a moderate, significant correlation, r=0.48 (p≤0.01), between the index based on questionnaire responses and VO 2max. Metabolic equivalent (MET) values of 6 or more from ActiReg and ``vigorous activity'' from the IPAQ most strongly correlated with the index (r=0.39, r=0.55, respectively). Associations of other measures obtained from ActiReg with questionnaire responses were weaker. Conclusions: Our results indicate that the PA questionnaire in HUNT 1 is reproducible and provides a useful measure of leisure-time PA for men. The questionnaire is very short, and compared favourably with much longer instruments for assessment of more vigorous PA. It should be an appropriate tool for use in further epidemiological studies, particularly when the interest is in aspects of PA reflected in fitness or METs greater than 6.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1403494807085373

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 330

Metadata

Authors
Kurtze, N., Rangul, V., Hustvedt, B.-E., & Flanders, W. D.
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
Published
2008-01
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
52-61
ISSN
  • 1403-4948 (ISSN-L)
  • 1651-1905
OpenAlex
W2004486458
Cited by
330
References
4
FWCI
10.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reliability and validity of self-reported physical activity in the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study — HUNT 1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1403494807085373
The paper
Kurtze, N., Rangul, V., Hustvedt, B.-E., & Flanders, W. D. (2008). Reliability and validity of self-reported physical activity in the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study — HUNT 1. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494807085373

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.