Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 44

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The effects of social protection policies on health inequalities: Evidence from systematic reviews

Hillier-Brown, Frances, Thomson, Katie, Mcgowan, Victoria, Cairns, Joanne, Eikemo, Terje A., Gil-Gonzále, Diana, Bambra, Clare·2019·Scandinavian Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Background: The welfare state distributes financial resources to its citizens – protecting them in times of adversity. Variations in how such social protection policies are administered have been attributed to important differences in population health. The aim of this systematic review of reviews is to update and appraise the evidence base of the effects of social protection policies on health inequalities. Methods/design: Systematic review methodology was used. Nine databases were searched from 2007 to 2017 for reviews of social policy interventions in high-income countries. Quality was assessed using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 tool. Results: Six systematic reviews were included in our review, reporting 50 unique primary studies. Two reviews explored income maintenance and poverty relief policies and found some, low quality, evidence that increased unemployment benefit generosity may improve population mental health. Four reviews explored active labour-market policies and found some, low-quality evidence, that return to work initiatives may lead to short-term health improvements, but that in the longer term, they can lead to declines in mental health. The more rigorously conducted reviews found no significant health effects of any of social protection policy under investigation. No reviews of family policies were located. Conclusions: The systematic review evidence base of the effects of social protection policy interventions remains sparse, of low quality, of limited generalizability (as the evidence base is concentrated in the Anglo-Saxon welfare state type), and relatively inconclusive. There is a clear need for evaluations in more diverse welfare state settings and particularly of family policies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1403494819848276

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. 10.1136/jech.2007.066787 · DOI
  2. 10.1136/jech.2008.082743 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1136/jech.2007.064295 · DOI
  4. 10.1177/095892879600600102 · DOI
  5. Esping-Anderson G., 1990, The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism
  6. 10.1093/eurpub/ckn092 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.10.017 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.01.030 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69341-0 · DOI
  10. Bergqvist K, 2013, BMC Public Health, 13
  11. 10.1093/ije/dyn078 · DOI
  12. 10.1017/S0047279404008542 · DOI
  13. 10.1017/S0047279401006584 · DOI
  14. 10.2190/HS.43.3.f · DOI
  15. 10.1177/1403494817726616 · DOI
  16. 10.1136/jech.2009.088740 · DOI
  17. 10.2190/HS.44.3.c · DOI
  18. 10.1093/pubmed/fdq028 · DOI
  19. 10.1007/978-3-319-25655-9_20 · DOI
  20. 10.1002/9780470712184 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1093/pubmed/fdu067 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/ijo.2014.75 · DOI
  23. Graham H, 2004, Health Inequalities: Concepts, frameworks and policy
  24. Pega F, 2013, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 8, CD009963
  25. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.03.025 · DOI
  26. 10.1186/1471-2458-11-170 · DOI
  27. Lucas P, 2008, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2
  28. 10.1186/s12889-016-2880-9 · DOI
  29. Gibson M, 2017, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CD009820
  30. 10.1186/1471-2458-6-81 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.09.002 · DOI
  32. 10.1136/bmj.322.7280.204 · DOI
  33. 10.1177/1403494817715954 · DOI
  34. 10.1136/jech.2008.077354 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Moher D, 2009, Plos Medicine, 6
  36. 10.1136/jech-2018-211283 · DOI

Cited by

See all 44

Metadata

Authors
Hillier-Brown, F., Thomson, K., Mcgowan, V., Cairns, J., Eikemo, T. A., Gil-Gonzále, D., & Bambra, C.
Affiliations
  • Department of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Durham University, UK
  • Fuse – UKCRC Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, UK
  • Centre for Global Health Inequalities Research (CHAIN), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Norway
  • Department of Community Nursing, Preventive Medicine and Public Health and History of Science, University of Alicante, Spain
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
Published
2019-05-09
Volume
47
Issue
6
Pages
655-665
ISSN
  • 1403-4948
  • 1651-1905
Cited by
44
References
6
Language
en
Funders
NORFACE (462-14-110)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effects of social protection policies on health inequalities: Evidence from systematic reviews. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1403494819848276
The paper
Hillier-Brown, F., Thomson, K., Mcgowan, V., Cairns, J., Eikemo, T. A., Gil-Gonzále, D., & Bambra, C. (2019). The effects of social protection policies on health inequalities: Evidence from systematic reviews. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494819848276

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.