PreprintCited by 15Digital Mental Health InterventionsSocial Robot Interaction and HRIAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

LLM-Powered Socially Assistive Robot-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Exercises: an Exploratory Study with University Students

Open access
Kian, Mina, Zong, Mingyu, Fischer, Katrin, Singh, Abhyuday, Velentza, Anna-Maria, O'Connell, Amy, Ignatova, Lydia, Sang, Pau +8 more·2024·arXiv

Preprint — published as 10.3389/frobt.2026.1802622

Abstract

Mental health is a significant healthcare challenge, and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is a widely used therapeutic method for treating anxiety and depression. However, traditional CBT often requires access to trained clinicians and can be cost-prohibitive or logistically difficult for many individuals. To address these barriers, we developed a low-cost socially assistive robot (SAR) that uses a large language model (LLM) to guide the user through interactive at-home CBT exercises. In this exploratory study, 38 university students completed CBT exercises across a 15-day period using one of three modalities: with a robot (using an LLM for dialogue), a chatbot (using the same LLM for dialogue), or traditional CBT worksheets. We measured weekly therapeutic outcomes, changes in pre-/post-session anxiety measures, and adherence to completing CBT exercises. Our findings indicate that self-reported general psychological distress significantly decreased over the study period in the robot and worksheet conditions but not in the chatbot condition. Additionally, the SAR enabled significant single-session improvements on more days than the other two conditions combined. Mixed-effects modeling further suggested that the robot and chatbot conditions better reduced post-session anxiety for those with elevated levels of anxiety. Our findings suggest that SAR-guided, LLM-powered CBT may be an effective method for supporting therapeutic progress and decreasing user anxiety immediately after completing the CBT exercise. The findings underscore the potential for combining AI-driven personalization with socially assistive robotics to create accessible, scalable, and engaging mental health interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2402.17937

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. [8][8] Wilma A Bainbridge, Justin Hart, Elizabeth S Kim, and Brian Scassellati. 2008. The effect of presence on human-robot interaction. In RO-MAN 2008-The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication . IEEE, 701-706. -
  2. [9][9] Wolmet Barendregt, Ana Paiva, A Kappas, A Vasalou, C Heath, S Serholt, C Basedow, and AO Patrcia. 2014. Child-robot interaction: Social bonding, learning and ethics. In Workshop proceedings of Interaction Design and Children Conference IDC14 . -
  3. [14][14] Cindy L Bethel, Matthew R Stevenson, and Brian Scassellati. 2011. Secret-sharing: Interactions between a child, robot, and adult. In 2011 IEEE International Conference on systems, man, and cybernetics . IEEE, 2489-2494. -
  4. [17][17] John Brooke. 1996. Sus: a 'quick and dirty'usability. Usability evaluation in industry 189, 3 (1996), 189-194. -
  5. [26][26] Francesca Dino, Rohola Zandie, Hojjat Abdollahi, Sarah Schoeder, and Mohammad H Mahoor. 2019. Delivering cognitive behavioral therapy using a conversational social robot. In 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) . IEEE, 2089-2095. -
  6. [29][29] David Feil-Seifer and Maja J Mataric. 2005. Defining socially assistive robotics. In 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005. IEEE, 465-468. -
  7. [32][32] Julia Fink. 2012. Anthropomorphism and human likeness in the design of robots and human-robot interaction. In Social Robotics: 4th International Conference, ICSR 2012, Chengdu, China, October 29-31, 2012. Proceedings 4 . Springer, 199-208. -
  8. [39][39] Martin Ingeson, Madeleine Blusi, and Juan Carlos Nieves. 2018. Smart augmented reality mHealth for medication adherence.. In AIH@ IJCAI . 157-168. -
  9. [43][43] Younbo Jung and Kwan Min Lee. 2004. Effects of physical embodiment on social presence of social robots. Proceedings of PRESENCE 2004 (2004), 80-87. -
  10. [62][62] Maja J Matarić and Brian Scassellati. 2016. Socially assistive robotics. Springer handbook of robotics (2016), 1973-1994. -
  11. [78][78] Elena Márquez Segura, Michael Kriegel, Ruth Aylett, Amol Deshmukh, and Henriette Cramer. 2012. How do you like me in this: User embodiment preferences for companion agents. In Intelligent Virtual Agents: 12th International Conference, IVA 2012, Santa Cruz, CA, USA, September, 12-14, 2012. Proceedings 12 . Springer, 112-125. -
  12. [79][79] Zhonghao Shi, Han Chen, Anna-Maria Velentza, Siqi Liu, Nathaniel Dennler, Allison O'Connell, and Maja Mataric. 2023. Evaluating and Personalizing User-Perceived Quality of Text-to-Speech Voices for Delivering Mindfulness Meditation with Different Physical Embodiments. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction . 516-524. -
  13. [81][81] Zhonghao Shi, Amy O'Connell, Zongjian Li, Siqi Liu, Jennifer Ayissi, Guy Hoffman, Mohammad Soleymani, and Maja J Matarić. 2024. Build your own robot friend: An open-source learning module for accessible and engaging AI education. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence , Vol. 38. 23137-23145. -
  14. [82][82] Michael Suguitan and Guy Hoffman. 2019. Blossom: A handcrafted open-source robot. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI) 8, 1 (2019), 1-27. -
  15. [83][83] JaYoung Sung, Rebecca E Grinter, and Henrik I Christensen. 2009. " Pimp My Roomba" designing for personalization. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 193-196. -
  16. [84][84] Katelyn Swift-Spong, Elaine Short, Eric Wade, and Maja J Matarić. 2015. Effects of comparative feedback from a socially assistive robot on self-efficacy in post-stroke rehabilitation. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR) . IEEE, 764-769. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kian, M., Zong, M., Fischer, K., Singh, A., Velentza, A.-M., O'Connell, A., Ignatova, L., Sang, P., Upadhyay, S., Gupta, A., Faruki, M., Browning, W., Arnold, S. M. R., Chen, M., Krishnamachari, B., & Matarić, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • École nationale d'ingénieurs de Brest (FR)
Corresponding author
Kian, Mina
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
Volume
13
Pages
1802622-1802622
ISSN
2296-9144 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7212001975
Cited by
15
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 2
FWCI
29.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Robotics and AI (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1925083)
  • University of Southern California
  • National Institutes of Health (1r01mh139134-01)
  • Center for Undergraduate Research and Scholarship, Bowling Green State University
  • Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California
  • National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
socially assistive robots, cognitive behavioral therapy, large language models, chatbots, anxiety reduction, depression, mental health interventions, exercise adherence, psychological distress, university students, low-cost robotics, AI-driven personalization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review