The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
More Tweets, More Votes: Social Media as a Quantitative Indicator of Political Behavior
Open accessAbstract
Is social media a valid indicator of political behavior? There is considerable debate about the validity of data extracted from social media for studying offline behavior. To address this issue, we show that there is a statistically significant association between tweets that mention a candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives and his or her subsequent electoral performance. We demonstrate this result with an analysis of 542,969 tweets mentioning candidates selected from a random sample of 3,570,054,618, as well as Federal Election Commission data from 795 competitive races in the 2010 and 2012 U.S. congressional elections. This finding persists even when controlling for incumbency, district partisanship, media coverage of the race, time, and demographic variables such as the district's racial and gender composition. Our findings show that reliable data about political behavior can be extracted from social media.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/267990 · Cited by 9,537
Twitter mood predicts the stock market
Bollen, J., Mao, H., & Zeng, X. (2011) · Journal of Computational Science · doi:10.1016/j.jocs.2010.12.007 · Cited by 5,206
Self-citationLazer, D., Pentland, A., Adamic, L., Aral, S., Barabási, A.-L., Brewer, D., Christakis, N., Contractor, N., Fowler, J., Gutmann, M., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1167742 · Cited by 3,365
Beyond SES: A Resource Model of Political Participation
Brady, H. E., Verba, S., & Schlozman, K. L. (1995) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2082425 · Cited by 2,900
Social Desirability Bias and the Validity of Indirect Questioning
Fisher, R. J. (1993) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209351 · Cited by 2,789
Predicting Elections with Twitter: What 140 Characters Reveal about Political Sentiment
Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T., Sandner, P., & Welpe, I. (2010) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v4i1.14009 · Cited by 2,649
Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities
Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T., & Tseng, B. (2007) · Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 workshop on Web mining and social network analysis · doi:10.1145/1348549.1348556 · Cited by 2,645
Predicting the future with social media
Asur, S., & Huberman, B. A. (2010) · 2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology · doi:10.1109/wi-iat.2010.63 · Cited by 2,081
From Tweets to Polls: Linking Text Sentiment to Public Opinion Time Series
O'Connor, B., Balasubramanyan, R., Routledge, B., & Smith, N. (2010) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v4i1.14031 · Cited by 1,923
Who interacts on the Web?: The intersection of users’ personality and social media use
Correa, T., Hinsley, A. W., & de Zúñiga, H. G. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.09.003 · Cited by 1,915
Cited by
Boutyline, A., & Willer, R. (2017) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12337 · Cited by 491
Seizing the moment: The presidential campaigns’ use of Twitter during the 2012 electoral cycle
Kreiss, D. (2016) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444814562445 · Cited by 331
Online and Social Media Data As an Imperfect Continuous Panel Survey
Diaz, F., Gamon, M., Hofman, J. M., Kıcıman, E., & Rothschild, D. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0145406 · Cited by 131
Primack, B. A., & Escobar-Viera, C. G. (2017) · Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.chc.2016.12.007 · Cited by 71
Using sentiment analysis to predict opinion inversion in Tweets of political communication
Matalon, Y., Magdaci, O., Almozlino, A., & Yamin, D. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-86510-w · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- DiGrazia, J., McKelvey, K., Bollen, J., & Rojas, F.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2013-11-27
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- e79449
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3123712780
- Cited by
- 341
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 95.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: More Tweets, More Votes: Social Media as a Quantitative Indicator of Political Behavior. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0079449
- The paper
- DiGrazia, J., McKelvey, K., Bollen, J., & Rojas, F. (2013). More Tweets, More Votes: Social Media as a Quantitative Indicator of Political Behavior. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079449
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
