Cited by 508Photography and Visual CulturePhotographic and Visual ArtsMedia and Digital Communication

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 1 of the 43 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Digital photography: communication, identity, memory

Open access
van Dijck, José·2008·Visual Communication

Abstract

Taking photographs seems no longer primarily an act of memory intended to safeguard a family's pictorial heritage, but is increasingly becoming a tool for an individual's identity formation and communication. Digital cameras, cameraphones, photoblogs and other multipurpose devices are used to promote the use of images as the preferred idiom of a new generation of users. The aim of this article is to explore how technical changes (digitization) combined with growing insights in cognitive science and socio-cultural transformations have affected personal photography. The increased manipulation of photographic images may suit the individual's need for continuous self-remodelling and instant communication and bonding. However, that same manipulability may also lessen our grip on our images' future repurposing and reframing. Memory is not eradicated from digital multipurpose tools. Instead, the function of memory reappears in the networked, distributed nature of digital photographs, as most images are sent over the internet and stored in virtual space.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Van Dijck argues that digitization has not displaced photography's memory function but rebalanced personal photography toward communication and identity formation, with memory reappearing in the networked, distributed storage of images online. The same malleability that enables self-remodeling also erodes control over images' future reframing and repurposing.

Key findings

  • Personal photography is shifting from family memory practice to individual self-presentation and peer communication: ethnographic work (Harrison, 2002) finds self-presentation now a major function of photographs, and one US study of teens aged 14–19 (Schiano, Chen & Isaacs, 2002) found that while most described photos as permanent records, their behavior showed a preference for photography as social communication.
  • Cameraphone images function like postcards — "temporary reminders rather than permanent keepsakes" — where "the value of individual pictures decreases, while the general significance of visual communication augments."
  • Cognitive research cited by the paper reports that more than 50% of subjects constructed false memories from retouched personal photographs depicting events that never happened, showing autobiographical memory is vulnerable to both self-induced and covert manipulation.
  • The Abu Ghraib case illustrates distributed memory: pictures circulated as ephemeral "office jokes" and bonding gestures were reframed as evidence and became "a permanent engraving in the consciousness of a generation," after which the military banned personal photography on military premises.

Methods

  • A theoretical/cultural analysis combining semiotics (Barthes's four image-repertoires), cognitive-psychology findings on false memory, and socio-cultural theory (individualization, the experience economy).
  • Draws on published ethnographic and empirical studies of teen and cameraphone photography (Harrison, 2002; Schiano et al., 2002; Kindberg et al., 2005; Van House et al., 2005) plus illustrative cases: an anecdote of a doctored dorm photo, photoblogs, commercial photo-editing software, and the 2004 Abu Ghraib photographs.
  • Main analysis traces three functions of personal photography — communication, identity formation, memory — across analogue and digital conditions, organized around the tension of control versus lack of control over one's images.

Limitations

  • The paper notes "a conspicuous absence of interdisciplinary research in this area": cognitive studies ignore how people use digital photography to manipulate their own pictures, while cultural/semiotic analyses disregard psychological research.
  • The article is a theoretical essay with no original empirical data; its claims rest on cited studies and illustrative examples (e.g., a single anecdote, one photoblog, one software vendor). (Evident from the text.)
  • The author explicitly declines to resolve causation — "whether changing concepts of identity have followed from evolving technologies or the other way around is in fact besides the point" — and concludes it is "difficult to conclude whether digital photography has led to more or less control over our personal images." (Evident from the text.)

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1470357207084865

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

1 of 43 cited sources checked · 1 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 46 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 64
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 89
119 of 119
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Most digital images are sent over the internet and stored in virtual space.

    “as most images are sent over the internet and stored in virtual space.”
    “as most images are sent over the wires and end up somewhere in virtual space.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The emphasis on individualism and personhood at the expense of family is a social pattern whose roots can be traced back as far as the late 1960s and early 1970s.

    “The emphasis on individualism and personhood at the expense of family is a social pattern which roots can be traced back as far as the late 1960s and early 1970s.”
2 of 2

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 42 references

3 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Chalfen, Richard, 2002, Studies, 17, 141
  2. Hersh, Seymour, 2004, The New Yorker
  3. Holland, Patricia (1991) `Introduction: History, Memory, and the Family Album', in J. Spence and Patricia Holland (eds) Family Snaps: The Meaning of Domestic Photography, pp. 1—14. London: Virago.
  4. Lehtonen, Turo-Kimmo , Koskinen, Ilpo and Kurvinen , Esko (2002) `Mobile Digital Pictures — The Future of the Postcard? Findings from an Experimental Field Study', in V. Laakso and J.O. Ostman (eds) Postcards and Cultural Rituals, pp. 69—96. Korttien Talo: Haemeenlinna.
  5. Lury, Celia, 2002, Prosthetic Culture: Photography, Identity, Memory
  6. Mules, Warwick, 2000, Cultural Studies, 14, 303
  7. Pine, Joseph, 1999, The Experience Economy: Work Is a Theatre and Every Business a Stage
  8. Rose, Steve, 1992, The Making of Memory
  9. Schiano, Diane J., Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Co-operative Work (CSCW)
  10. Slater, Don (1995) `Domestic Photography and Digital Culture', in Martin Lister (ed.) The Photographic Image in Digital Culture, pp. 129—46. London: Routledge.
  11. Sontag, Susan, 1973, On Photography
  12. Strange, Deryn, 2005, Process, 6, 237
  13. Van House, Nancy, Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1853—6

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 508

Metadata

Authors
van Dijck, J.
Affiliations
University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands,
Venue
Visual Communication
Published
2008-02
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
57-76
ISSN
  • 1470-3572 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-3214
OpenAlex
W2107867007
Cited by
508
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 16
FWCI
237.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Visual Communication (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Photography and Visual Culture
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Museology › Photographic and Visual Arts
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media and Digital Communication
Keywords
digital photography, personal photography, identity construction, memory, image editing, self-representation, social communication, photoblogs, digital cameras, distributed memory, cognitive science, sociocultural change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-05, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-05 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review