The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rationalizing service logic, or understanding services as experience?
Abstract
This article discusses the argument put forward by Vargo and Lusch (2004) that a new service dominant logic is emerging within marketing. Taking on this new service logic means our understanding of marketing has developed from a focus on exchange of goods to a broader focus on exchange of services. However, in seeking to elaborate on Vargo and Lusch's argument, limitations are highlighted and consequently their eight foundational premises are challenged at an ontological level. While Vargo and Lusch recognize the evolution of marketing towards a service orientation, their understanding of this and what it means for marketing continues to be founded on the same rationalistic assumptions as the traditional goods-centred logic. In recognizing the emergent service orientation, marketers and researchers need to question their underlying assumptions and seek to understand services as constituted in the customer's experience.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036 · Cited by 14,779
A Role Theory Perspective on Dyadic Interactions: The Service Encounter
Solomon, M. R., Surprenant, C., Czepiel, J. A., & Gutman, E. G. (1985) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1251180 · Cited by 2,004 · cited 3×
“Many service encounters are typically characterized by a high degree of human interaction (Solomon et al., 1985) and this is a necessarily dynamic process (Claycomb et al.”
BackgroundClients as "Partial" Employees of Service Organizations: Role Development in Client Participation
Mills, P. K., & Morris, J. H. (1986) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258392 · Cited by 735
Cited by
Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-007-0069-6 · Cited by 7,824
Chandler, J. D., & Lusch, R. F. (2015) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670514537709 · Cited by 549
Customer dominant value formation in service
Heinonen, K., Strandvik, T., & Voima, P. (2013) · European Business Review · doi:10.1108/09555341311302639 · Cited by 353
Drivers of customers' service experiences: a study in the restaurant industry
Walter, U., Edvardsson, B., & Öström, Å. (2010) · Managing Service Quality: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/09604521011041961 · Cited by 234
Metadata
- Authors
- Schembri, S.
- Venue
- Marketing Theory
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-09
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 381-392
- ISSN
- 1470-5931 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-301X
- OpenAlex
- W2106032704
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 25.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rationalizing service logic, or understanding services as experience? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1470593106066798
- The paper
- Schembri, S. (2006). Rationalizing service logic, or understanding services as experience? Marketing Theory. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593106066798
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.