The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On defining marketing: finding a new roadmap for marketing
Abstract
The American Marketing Association has updated its marketing definition and included value for customers and customer relationships in the new definition. Moreover, marketing is defined as one organizational function. Taking mainly service and relationship marketing research as a starting point, this present article broadens the discussion to a generic marketing level, and analyses the underpinning logic of the updated definition. It concludes that the use of these elements of the definition is not well founded in current research. Also, it shows that marketing cannot be treated as one organizational function only. Drawing on the analysis of the updated definition, a set of propositions regarding the scope and content of a marketing definition are developed. Finally, based on the analysis and this set of propositions, an alternative marketing definition, based on the promise concept, and labelled a promises management definition, is suggested and its implications for marketing research and practice are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing
Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299405800302 · Cited by 22,355
Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036 · Cited by 14,779
A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions
Oliver, R. L. (1980) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378001700405 · Cited by 14,494
Servicescapes: The Impact of Physical Surroundings on Customers and Employees
Bitner, M. J. (1992) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1252042 · Cited by 7,271
Consumer Culture Theory (CCT): Twenty Years of Research
Arnould, E. J., & Thompson, C. J. (2005) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/426626 · Cited by 3,677
The value concept and relationship marketing
Ravald, A., & Grönroos, C. (1996) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/03090569610106626 · Cited by 2,180
Self-citationBagozzi, R. P. (1975) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1250593 · Cited by 1,648
Cited by
Co-creating value for luxury brands
Tynan, C., McKechnie, S., & Chhuon, C. (2010) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.10.012 · Cited by 960
Working consumers: the next step in marketing theory?
Cova, B., & Dalli, D. (2009) · Marketing Theory · doi:10.1177/1470593109338144 · Cited by 746
Kamboj, S., Sarmah, B., Gupta, S., & Dwivedi, Y. (2018) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.12.001 · Cited by 591
Food tourism value: Investigating the factors that influence tourists to revisit
Rousta, A., & Jamshidi, D. (2020) · Journal of Vacation Marketing · doi:10.1177/1356766719858649 · Cited by 348
Value co-creation: Concept and contexts of application and study
Alves, H., Fernandes, C., & Raposo, M. (2016) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.029 · Cited by 284
Metadata
- Authors
- Grönroos, C.
- Venue
- Marketing Theory
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-12
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 395-417
- ISSN
- 1470-5931 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-301X
- OpenAlex
- W2153302356
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 35.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On defining marketing: finding a new roadmap for marketing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1470593106069930
- The paper
- Grönroos, C. (2006). On defining marketing: finding a new roadmap for marketing. Marketing Theory. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593106069930
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.