The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Unpacking “Sexting”: A Systematic Review of Nonconsensual Sexting in Legal, Educational, and Psychological Literatures
Abstract
Concerns about sexting are increasingly prevalent in mainstream and academic media despite limited and inconsistent research findings about the practice. Much of this discourse centers around harm and sexting is commonly considered to be a risky behavior. A driving factor in these discussions is the apparent conflation of consensual and nonconsensual acts or sexting behaviors. A systematic review was conducted to determine the extent to which consensual and nonconsensual acts were conflated in the legal, educational, and psychological literatures on sexting, and how nonconsensual sexting was conceptualized within these disciplines. Definitions of sexting varied widely with regard to the inclusion or exclusion of nonconsensual acts. Nonconsensual acts were conceptualized in the following ways: as a risk of sexing, as being the fault of the victim, as bullying, or as a form of violence against women. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“More recently, researchers have pushed to separate definitions of sexting according to degrees of consent (Slane, 2010; Slane, 2013; Krieger, 2017).”
From Young people's experiences of image-based sexual harassment and abuse in England and Canada: Toward a feminist framing of technologically facilitated sexual violence (2022) · cites this paper as Krieger, 2017
Citations
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414
Feminists Theorize the Political
(2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203723999 · Cited by 2,974
Noblit, G., & Hare, R. (1988) · doi:10.4135/9781412985000 · Cited by 2,723
Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: A review of possible methods
Dixon-Woods, M., Agarwal, S., Jones, D., Young, B., & Sutton, A. (2005) · Journal of Health Services Research & Policy · doi:10.1177/135581960501000110 · Cited by 2,132
Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1994) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb00448.x · Cited by 1,160
(2025) · McGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l'éducation de McGill · doi:10.7202/mje · Cited by 1,064
Teen girls, sexual double standards and ‘sexting’: Gendered value in digital image exchange
Ringrose, J., Harvey, L., Gill, R., & Livingstone, S. (2013) · Feminist Theory · doi:10.1177/1464700113499853 · Cited by 618
Sexting prevalence and correlates: A systematic literature review
Klettke, B., Hallford, D. J., & Mellor, D. J. (2013) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2013.10.007 · Cited by 615
Disruptive Voices: The Possibilities of Feminist Research
Fine, M. (1992) · doi:10.3998/mpub.23686 · Cited by 441
Disruptive Voices: The Possibilities of Feminist Research
Fine, M. (1992) · Cited by 417
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Barry J. L., 2010, Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law, 13, 129
- DeMitchell T. A., 2011, Cardozo Public Law, Policy, & Ethics Journal, 10, 1
- Hall R, 2004, Hypatia, 19, 1
- Kowalczyk W., 2010, Cleveland State Law Review, 58, 685
- Levendowski A., 2014, N.Y.U. Journal of Intellectual Property & Entertainment Law, 3, 422
- Nunziato D. C., 2012, Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, 10, 57
- Pellai L. A., 2015, Minerva Pediatrica, 67, 1
- Ringrose J., 2012, A qualitative study of children, young people and ‘sexting’
- Weis K., 1973, Issues in Criminology, 8, 71
- Willard N. E., 2011, Brigham Young University. Education and Law Journal, 1, 75
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Prevalence of Sexting Behaviors Among Emerging Adults: A Meta-Analysis
Mori, C., Cooke, J. E., Temple, J. R., Ly, A., Lu, Y., Anderson, N. J., Rash, C. L., & Madigan, S. L. (2020) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-020-01656-4 · Cited by 262
Networked Individuals, Gendered Violence: A Literature Review of Cyberviolence
Backe, E. L., Lilleston, P. S., & McCleary‐Sills, J. (2018) · Violence and Gender · doi:10.1089/vio.2017.0056 · Cited by 170
Prevalence of Online Sexual Offenses Against Children in the US
Finkelhor, D., Turner, H., & Colburn, D. (2022) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.34471 · Cited by 164
Sexting and Psychological Distress: The Role of Unwanted and Coerced Sexts
Klettke, B., Hallford, D. J., Clancy, E. M., Mellor, D. J., & Toumbourou, J. W. (2019) · Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2018.0291 · Cited by 160
“3 Given this, researchers have examined the link between sexting behavior and a range of mental health variables; however, findings have been largely mixed.”
The dark side of sexting—Factors predicting the dissemination of sexts
Clancy, E. M., Klettke, B., & Hallford, D. J. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.023 · Cited by 139
Metadata
- Authors
- Krieger, M. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Windsor (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Krieger, Michelle A.
- ORCID
- Krieger, Michelle A.
- Venue
- Trauma, Violence, & Abuse
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-07-19
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 593-601
- ISSN
- 1524-8380 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8324
- OpenAlex
- W2497505743
- Cited by
- 128
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 1.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Trauma Violence & Abuse (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
- Keywords
- sexting, sexual violence, violence against women, bullying, victim blaming, risk-taking, legal definitions, educational discourse
- MeSH terms
- Female, Humans, Male, Risk-Taking, Sexual Behavior, Sex Offenses, Internet, Cell Phone, Bullying, Text Messaging, Social Media
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
