Cited by 140Sexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyGender, Feminism, and MediaStalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment

The dark side of sexting—Factors predicting the dissemination of sexts

Open access
Clancy, Elizabeth M., Klettke, Bianca, Hallford, David J.·2019·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.023

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In both Spain and Italy, forwarding sexual content featuring someone without their consent is a form of harassment that, when it occurs, is often associated with other more frequent and normalised forms of online sexual aggression.

    “These data suggest that, in both countries, forwarding sexual content featuring someone without their consent is a form of harassment that, when it occurs, is often associated with other more frequent and normalised forms of online sexual aggression (Clancy et al., 2019; Gámez-Guadix et al., 2022b; Ybarra & Thompson, 2018), such as the direct and ambiguous forms measured in this study.”
  • Among studies examining nonconsensual sharing, four found women more likely than men to engage in the behavior, though difference was small in Hu et al. (2023) and Clancy et al. (2019).

    “whereas four studies found that women were more likely than men to engage in the nonconsensual sharing of other people’s intimate images, although the difference was small in Hu et al. (2023) and Clancy et al. (2019)”

    From Image-Based Sexual Abuse Perpetration: A Scoping Review (2024) · cites this paper as Clancy et al. (2019)

  • Clancy et al. (2019) found 'it was no big deal' or 'as a joke, to be funny' were most frequently endorsed reasons, and men more likely to agree that sext dissemination can enhance social status (40.7% vs 5.0%).

    “These findings were consistent with their previous study (Clancy et al., 2019), where “it was no big deal” or “as a joke, to be funny” were the most frequently endorsed reasons, and men being more likely to agree that sext dissemination can enhance social status (40.7% vs. 5.0%).”

    From Image-Based Sexual Abuse Perpetration: A Scoping Review (2024) · cites this paper as Clancy et al., 2019

  • Motivations related to bragging or improving social status were more likely to be reported by men compared to women according to one reviewed study.

    “Motivations related to bragging or improving social status were more likely to be reported by men compared to women according to one study (Clancy et al., 2019).”

    From Image-Based Sexual Abuse Perpetration: A Scoping Review (2024) · cites this paper as Clancy et al., 2019

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clancy, E. M., Klettke, B., & Hallford, D. J.
Affiliations
Deakin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Clancy, Elizabeth M.
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
92
Pages
266-272
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2900469320
Cited by
139
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
FWCI
11.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • Own your potential (DEAKIN) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
Keywords
sexting, Dark Triad personality, Machiavellianism, psychopathy, narcissism, subjective norms, sexual activity, young adults, online sexual behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review