Cited by 48Child Abuse and TraumaSexual Assault and Victimization StudiesPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

Victims of Technology-Assisted Child Sexual Abuse: A Scoping Review

Open access
Chauviré-Geib, Katrin, Fegert, Jörg M.·2024·Trauma, Violence, & Abuse

Abstract

Over the past two decades, technology-assisted child sexual abuse (TA-CSA) has become the focus of attention in politics, legislation, society, as well as research. However, the majority of literature and studies focus primarily on the offenders. This scoping review therefore aims to illustrate how victims of TA-CSA are represented in studies as primary participants. The databases Embase, PsychInfo, PSYNDEX, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science as well as reference lists were searched. Studies needed to be published between 2007 and 2021 and obtain data directly from and about victims to be included in this review. A total of 570 articles were identified from which 20 studies met inclusion criteria. The analysis showed that data can be obtained via different samples like adult and minor victims or other data such as legal documents or sexualized images. The studies researched different types of TA-CSA including exposure to pornographic material, online grooming leading to both online and offline sexual abuse, sexting and sexualized images, and the visual depiction of sexually explicit content. Consequences due to the abuse were of an emotional and psychological nature, medical or physical or impacted relationships, and the social environment. Even though the impact of the abuse on the victims appeared to be similar between different types of TA-CSA, much remains unknown. In order to gain further and more detailed insight into victims of TA-CSA, a universally accepted definition of TA-CSA as well as its different types and their distinctions needs to be established.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/15248380231178754

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Established psychological harms linked to CSAM dissemination are almost certain to persist when existing abusive material is multiplied, altered, or rendered more violent through AI tools.

    “However, established psychological harms linked to the dissemination of CSAM-including symptoms of post-traumatic stress, shame, anxiety, and self-blame-are almost certain to persist when existing abusive material is multiplied, altered, or rendered more violent through the use of AI tools (Chauviré-Geib and Fegert 2024).”

    From AI-generated child sexual abuse material: what’s the harm? (2026) · cites this paper as Chauviré-Geib and Fegert 2024

    The Introduction and ‘Consequences and Impact of the Abuse’ describe ongoing victimization when abusive material remains online, and report post-traumatic stress, shame, anxiety, and self-blame among victims. The review does not address AI multiplication or alteration of existing material, or establish that these harms are ‘almost certain’ to persist in those circumstances. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Canadian Centre for Child Protection (Ed.). (2017). Survivors' Survey: Executive Summary 2017. https://protectchildren.ca/pdfs/C3P_SurvivorsSurveyExecutiveSummary2017_en.pdf
  2. Hamilton-Giachritsis C. Sleath E. (2018). Effects of interpersonal crime on victims. In Davies G. M. Beech A. R. (Eds.), BPS textbooks in psychology. Forensic psychology: Crime, justice, law, interventions. Wiley.
  3. International Centre for Missing and Exploited Children. (2018). Child Sexual Abuse Material: Model Legislation & Global Review. https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/CSAM-Model-Law-9th-Ed-FINAL-12-3-18-1.pdf

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chauviré-Geib, K., & Fegert, J. M.
Affiliations
Universität Ulm (DE)
Corresponding author
Chauviré-Geib, Katrin
Venue
Trauma, Violence, & Abuse
Published
2023-06-14
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
1335-1348
ISSN
  • 1524-8380 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8324
OpenAlex
W4380577199
Cited by
48
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 2
FWCI
2.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trauma Violence & Abuse (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Keywords
child sexual abuse victims, online grooming, sexting, psychological effects of abuse
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Child Abuse, Sexual, Erotica, Humans, Technology, Crime Victims, Criminals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review