Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 21Sports Analytics and PerformanceDoping in SportsBenford’s Law and Fraud Detection

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Investigating Allegations of Pointshaving in NCAA Basketball Using Actual Sportsbook Betting Percentages

Paul, Rodney J., Weinbach, Andrew P.·2011·Journal of Sports Economics
DOI 10.1177/1527002510385904
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Detailed gambling market data are used to investigate allegations of pointshaving in college basketball by Wolfers. Data on actual sportsbook betting percentages on favorites and underdogs and changes in pointspreads are used to test for evidence of corruption by players and/or coaches of NCAA basketball teams. After establishing a rejection of the balanced book hypothesis, the authors test for corruption in a variety of ways by investigating the games that Wolfers describes as likely situations for pointshaving, specifically games involving big underdogs. In a variety of tests, which include differences in betting percentages on big underdogs who cover and do not cover the pointspread, betting simulations based on thresholds of percentage bet on underdogs, analysis of pointspread movements toward big underdogs, and an analysis of coaches and programs that meet the conditions of Wolfers, little evidence is found to suggest rampant pointshaving in this market.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1527002510385904

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Dietl, H.M., 2009, Journal of Sports Economics, OnlineFirst
  2. Gil, R., 2007, Journal of Prediction Markets, 1, 255
  3. Paul, R., 2008, International Journal of Sports Finance, 3, 2
  4. Roxborough, R., 1998, Sports book management: A guide for the legal book-maker
  5. 10.2307/1061582 · DOI

Cited by

See all 21

Related

Metadata

Authors
Paul, R. J., & Weinbach, A. P.
Affiliations
  • St. Bonaventure University (US)
  • Coastal Carolina University (US)
Corresponding author
Paul, Rodney J.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Sports Economics
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2010-10-28
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
432-447
ISSN
  • 1527-0025 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7794
DOI
10.1177/1527002510385904
OpenAlex
W2170544900
Cited by
20
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Sports Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Sports Analytics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Doping in Sports
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection
Keywords
NCAA basketball, corruption allegations, underdog, sports betting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.