CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 77

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Danger in the Air: Air Pollution and Cognitive Dysfunction

Cipriani, Gabriele, Danti, Sabrina, Carlesi, Cecilia, Borin, Gemma·2018·American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias®
DOI 10.1177/1533317518777859
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background: Clean air is considered to be a basic requirement for human health and well-being. Objective: To examine the relationship between cognitive performance and ambient pollution exposure. Methods: Studies were identified through a systematic search of online scientific databases, in addition to a manual search of the reference lists from the identified papers. Results: Air pollution is a multifaceted toxic chemical mixture capable of assaulting the central nervous system. Despite being a relatively new area of investigation, overall, there is mounting evidence implicating adverse effects of air pollution on cognitive function in both adults and children. Conclusions: Consistent evidence showed that exposure to air pollution, specifically exposure to particulate matter, caused poor age-related cognitive performance. Living in areas with high levels of air pollution has been linked to markers of neuroinflammation and neuropathology that are associated with neurodegenerative conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease-like brain pathologies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1533317518777859

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 66

  1. 10.1016/j.tins.2009.05.009 · DOI
  2. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000128587.30041.C8 · DOI
  3. 10.1001/jama.287.9.1132 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/j.mrrev.2007.08.003 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2014.05.003 · DOI
  6. 10.3389/fphar.2012.00046 · DOI
  7. 10.1080/15287390801997732 · DOI
  8. 10.1257/pol.20150085 · DOI
  9. 10.1080/02786820117903 · DOI
  10. Genc S, 2012, J Toxicol, 782462, 2012
  11. 10.1186/1742-2094-8-105 · DOI
  12. 10.1289/ehp.9030 · DOI
  13. 10.1146/annurev.pa.33.040193.002123 · DOI
  14. 10.1211/0022357022539 · DOI
  15. 10.1080/08958370490439597 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Elder A, 2006, Clin Occup Environ Med, 5, 785
  17. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.02.083 · DOI
  18. 10.1080/01926230252929954 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.neuro.2008.12.011 · DOI
  20. 10.2105/AJPH.78.8.975 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30073-4 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.008348 · DOI
  23. 10.1161/01.STR.28.6.1158 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70170-9 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1007/s11869-010-0101-8 · DOI
  26. 10.1080/01926230490520232 · DOI
  27. 10.1177/0192623307313011 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1016/j.etp.2009.02.117 · DOI
  29. 10.1017/S146342361400036X · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.07.031 · DOI
  31. 10.1038/sj.mp.4001809 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.03.007 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.neuro.2007.12.004 · DOI
  34. 10.3390/ijerph8072980 · DOI
  35. 10.3390/ijms12096267 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/S1471-4914(01)02173-6 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1007/s11064-007-9453-3 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.003 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1196/annals.1332.008 · DOI
  40. 10.1186/1743-8977-3-13 · DOI
  41. 10.3233/JAD-2011-110722 · DOI
  42. Moulton PV, 2012, J Environ Public Health, 472751, 2012
  43. 10.3233/JAD-2011-110722 · DOI
  44. 10.1080/01926230390226645 · DOI
  45. 10.1093/aje/kwp067 · DOI
  46. Lavy V, NBER Working Paper 20648. 2014
  47. 10.1016/j.envint.2014.10.028 · DOI
  48. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001792 · DOI
  49. 10.1289/ehp.0800023 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1289/ehp.1409449 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/j.envres.2017.08.031 · DOI
  52. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04195.x · DOI
  53. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32399-6 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1038/srep22429 · DOI
  55. 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.683 · DOI
  56. 10.1016/j.envint.2017.08.020 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1093/geronb/gbu064 · DOI
  58. 10.1289/ehp.1002767 · DOI
  59. 10.1016/j.neuro.2013.09.004 · DOI
  60. 10.3727/000000006783981990 · DOI
  61. 10.1016/j.envres.2009.08.003 · DOI · Paper page
  62. 10.1093/hmg/ddp413 · DOI
  63. 10.2105/AJPH.2008.154971 · DOI
  64. 10.1093/aje/kwm308 · DOI
  65. 10.1002/ana.24460 · DOI
  66. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.03.008 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 77

Metadata

Authors
Cipriani, G., Danti, S., Carlesi, C., & Borin, G.
Affiliations
  • Department of Neurology, Hospital of Viareggio, Lido di Camaiore, Lucca, Italy
  • Department of Sociology, Universita degli Studi di Pisa, Pisa, Toscana, Italy
ORCID
Cipriani, Gabriele
Venue
American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias®
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2018-06-06
Volume
33
Issue
6
Pages
333-341
ISSN
  • 1533-3175
  • 1938-2731
DOI
10.1177/1533317518777859
Cited by
77
References
7
Language
en
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review