Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 244

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Commensal Bacteria, Redox Stress, and Colorectal Cancer: Mechanisms and Models

Huycke, Mark M., Gaskins, H. Rex·2004·Experimental Biology and Medicine

Abstract

The potential role for commensal bacteria in colorectal carcinogenesis is explored in this review. Most colorectal cancers (CRCs) occur sporadically and arise from the gradual accumulation of mutations in genes regulating cell growth and DNA repair. Genetic mutations followed by clonal selection result in the transformation of normal cells into malignant derivatives. Numerous toxicological effects of colonic bacteria have been reported. However, those recognized as damaging epithelial cell DNA are most easily reconciled with the currently understood genetic basis for sporadic CRC. Thus, we focus on mechanisms by which particular commensal bacteria may convert dietary procarcinogens into DNA damaging agents (e.g., ethanol and heterocyclic amines) or directly generate carcinogens (e.g., fecapentaenes). Although these and other metabolic activities have yet to be linked directly to sporadic CRC, several lines of investigation are reviewed to highlight difficulties and progress in the area. Particular focus is given to commensal bacteria that alter the epithelial redox environment, such as production of oxygen radicals by Enterococcus faecalis or production of hydrogen sulfide by sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB). Super-oxide-produclng E. faecalis has conclusively been shown to cause colonic epithelial cell DNA damage. Though SRB-derived hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S) has not been reported thus far to induce DNA damage or function as a carcinogen, recent data demonstrate that this reductant activates molecular pathways implicated in CRC. These observations combined with evidence that SRB carriage may be genetically encoded evoke a working model that Incorporates multifactorial gene-environment interactions that appear to underlie the development of sporadic CRC.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/153537020422900702

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 244

Metadata

Authors
Huycke, M. M., & Gaskins, H. R.
Venue
Experimental Biology and Medicine
Published
2004-07
Volume
229
Issue
7
Pages
586-597
ISSN
  • 0071-3384 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-3702
  • 1535-3699
OpenAlex
W1923556669
Cited by
244
References
9
FWCI
2.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Commensal Bacteria, Redox Stress, and Colorectal Cancer: Mechanisms and Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/153537020422900702
The paper
Huycke, M. M., & Gaskins, H. R. (2004). Commensal Bacteria, Redox Stress, and Colorectal Cancer: Mechanisms and Models. Experimental Biology and Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1177/153537020422900702

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.