The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Commensal Bacteria, Redox Stress, and Colorectal Cancer: Mechanisms and Models
Abstract
The potential role for commensal bacteria in colorectal carcinogenesis is explored in this review. Most colorectal cancers (CRCs) occur sporadically and arise from the gradual accumulation of mutations in genes regulating cell growth and DNA repair. Genetic mutations followed by clonal selection result in the transformation of normal cells into malignant derivatives. Numerous toxicological effects of colonic bacteria have been reported. However, those recognized as damaging epithelial cell DNA are most easily reconciled with the currently understood genetic basis for sporadic CRC. Thus, we focus on mechanisms by which particular commensal bacteria may convert dietary procarcinogens into DNA damaging agents (e.g., ethanol and heterocyclic amines) or directly generate carcinogens (e.g., fecapentaenes). Although these and other metabolic activities have yet to be linked directly to sporadic CRC, several lines of investigation are reviewed to highlight difficulties and progress in the area. Particular focus is given to commensal bacteria that alter the epithelial redox environment, such as production of oxygen radicals by Enterococcus faecalis or production of hydrogen sulfide by sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB). Super-oxide-produclng E. faecalis has conclusively been shown to cause colonic epithelial cell DNA damage. Though SRB-derived hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S) has not been reported thus far to induce DNA damage or function as a carcinogen, recent data demonstrate that this reductant activates molecular pathways implicated in CRC. These observations combined with evidence that SRB carriage may be genetically encoded evoke a working model that Incorporates multifactorial gene-environment interactions that appear to underlie the development of sporadic CRC.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Genetic instabilities in human cancers
Lengauer, C., Kinzler, K. W., & Vogelstein, B. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/25292 · Cited by 4,168
The Causes of Cancer: Quantitative Estimates of Avoidable Risks of Cancer in the United States Today
Doll, R., & Peto, R. (1981) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/66.6.1192 · Cited by 3,927
A Dominant Mutation That Predisposes to Multiple Intestinal Neoplasia in the Mouse
Moser, A. R., Pitot, H. C., & Dove, W. F. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2296722 · Cited by 1,591
The Haber–Weiss reaction and mechanisms of toxicity
Kehrer, J. P. (2000) · Toxicology · doi:10.1016/s0300-483x(00)00231-6 · Cited by 1,418
Colorectal Cancer in Mice Genetically Deficient in the Mucin Muc2
Velcich, A., Yang, W., Heyer, J., Fragale, A., Nicholas, C., Viani, S., Kucherlapati, R., Lipkin, M., Yang, K., & Augenlicht, L. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1069094 · Cited by 936
Zoetendal, E. G., von Wright, A., Vilpponen-Salmela, T., Ben-Amor, K., Akkermans, A. D. L., & de Vos, W. M. (2002) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.68.7.3401-3407.2002 · Cited by 868
Mutagenicity and repair of oxidative DNA damage: insights from studies using defined lesions
Wang, D., Kreutzer, D. A., & Essigmann, J. M. (1998) · Mutation research. Fundamental and molecular mechanisms of mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/s0027-5107(98)00066-9 · Cited by 464
Magee, E. A., Richardson, C. J., Hughes, R., & Cummings, J. H. (2000) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/72.6.1488 · Cited by 359
Mcbain, A. J., & Macfarlane, G. T. (1998) · Journal of Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00222615-47-5-407 · Cited by 179
Cited by
Schwabe, R. F., & Jobin, C. (2013) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc3610 · Cited by 1,689
Structural segregation of gut microbiota between colorectal cancer patients and healthy volunteers
Wang, T., Cai, G., Qiu, Y., Fei, N., Zhang, M., Pang, X., Jia, W., Cai, S., & Zhao, L. (2012) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2011.109 · Cited by 1,287
Chronic kidney disease alters intestinal microbial flora
Vaziri, N. D., Wong, J., Pahl, M., Piceno, Y. M., Yuan, J., DeSantis, T. Z., Ni, Z., Nguyen, T.-H., & Andersen, G. L. (2013) · Kidney International · doi:10.1038/ki.2012.345 · Cited by 1,164
Nutrients, foods, and colorectal cancer prevention
Song, M., Garrett, W. S., & Chan, A. T. (2015) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2014.12.035 · Cited by 700
Stool microbiome and metabolome differences between colorectal cancer patients and healthy adults
Weir, T. L., Manter, D. K., Sheflin, A. M., Barnett, B. A., Heuberger, A. L., & Ryan, E. P. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0070803 · Cited by 642
Metadata
- Authors
- Huycke, M. M., & Gaskins, H. R.
- Venue
- Experimental Biology and Medicine
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2004-07
- Volume
- 229
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 586-597
- ISSN
- 0071-3384 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-3702
- 1535-3699
- OpenAlex
- W1923556669
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 2.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Commensal Bacteria, Redox Stress, and Colorectal Cancer: Mechanisms and Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/153537020422900702
- The paper
- Huycke, M. M., & Gaskins, H. R. (2004). Commensal Bacteria, Redox Stress, and Colorectal Cancer: Mechanisms and Models. Experimental Biology and Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1177/153537020422900702
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.