Cited by 1,164Gut microbiota and healthDialysis and Renal Disease ManagementGastrointestinal motility and disorders

Chronic kidney disease alters intestinal microbial flora

Open access
Vaziri, Nosratola D., Wong, Jakk, Pahl, Madeleine, Piceno, Yvette M., Yuan, Jun, DeSantis, Todd Z., Ni, Zhenmin, Nguyen, Tien-Hung +1 more·2013·Kidney International

Abstract

The population of microbes (microbiome) in the intestine is a symbiotic ecosystem conferring trophic and protective functions. Since the biochemical environment shapes the structure and function of the microbiome, we tested whether uremia and/or dietary and pharmacologic interventions in chronic kidney disease alters the microbiome. To identify different microbial populations, microbial DNA was isolated from the stools of 24 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and 12 healthy persons, and analyzed by phylogenetic microarray. There were marked differences in the abundance of 190 bacterial operational taxonomic units (OTUs) between the ESRD and control groups. OTUs from Brachybacterium, Catenibacterium, Enterobacteriaceae, Halomonadaceae, Moraxellaceae, Nesterenkonia, Polyangiaceae, Pseudomonadaceae, and Thiothrix families were markedly increased in patients with ESRD. To isolate the effect of uremia from inter-individual variations, comorbid conditions, and dietary and medicinal interventions, rats were studied 8 weeks post 5/6 nephrectomy or sham operation. This showed a significant difference in the abundance of 175 bacterial OTUs between the uremic and control animals, most notably as decreases in the Lactobacillaceae and Prevotellaceae families. Thus, uremia profoundly alters the composition of the gut microbiome. The biological impact of this phenomenon is unknown and awaits further investigation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ki.2012.345

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vaziri, N. D., Wong, J., Pahl, M., Piceno, Y. M., Yuan, J., DeSantis, T. Z., Ni, Z., Nguyen, T.-H., & Andersen, G. L.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
  • Second Genome (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Vaziri, Nosratola D.
Venue
Kidney International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-02
Volume
83
Issue
2
Pages
308-315
ISSN
0085-2538 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2171060095
Cited by
1,164
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 82 · 2025: 86 · 2024: 104 · 2023: 101 · 2022: 137 · 2021: 128 · 2020: 114 · 2019: 86 · 2018: 98 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 5
FWCI
14.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Kidney International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
chronic kidney disease, gut microbiota, end-stage renal disease, uremia, intestinal bacterial flora, 5/6 nephrectomy, Lactobacillaceae, Prevotellaceae, Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonadaceae
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Animals, Bacteria, Feces, Female, Humans, Intestines, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Male, Middle Aged, Uremia, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review