Cited by 18Sexual Assault and Victimization StudiesPolicing Practices and PerceptionsIntimate Partner and Family Violence

Birds of a feather or fish out of water? Policewomen taking rape reports

Rich, Karen, Seffrin, Patrick·2014·Feminist Criminology

Abstract

Police departments and victim advocacy organizations are gendered institutions. In addition, rape is a gendered crime with most victims being female and most perpetrators male. On the job, female officers may experience harassment, discrimination, and pressure to conform. Rape cases may present unique challenges for them given these dynamics. A total of 429 police officers were quantitatively surveyed on colleagues’ comments about rape victims, utilization of victim advocates, perceptions of rape-related training, and inclination to encourage loved ones to make reports. Significant gender differences were identified in most areas. Results are discussed in relation to previous research on gender and police work.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1557085113510551

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rich & Seffrin (2012, 2013, 2014) received a score of 2 for reliability and validity due to administering author-constructed methods and providing validity and reliability scores.

    “Rich & Seffrin, 2012, 2013, 2014), received a score of 2 for reliability and validity of their measure(s) due to administering author constructed methods, and providing validity and reliability scores.”
  • Female officers were more likely to make personal contact with advocacy agency and involve them early in the process.

    “Female officers more likely to make personal contact with advocacy agency and involve them early in the process.”
  • Female officers showed more enthusiasm than male colleagues in working with victim advocates.

    “Female officers showed more enthusiasm than male colleagues in working with victim advocates.”
  • Female officers were 2.7 times more likely than male officers to report hearing negative comments made.

    “Female officers were 2.7 times more likely than male officers to report hearing negative comments made.”
  • Female officers were more likely than male officers to highlight that officers in their department would make negative comments about rape victims.

    “Female officers were more likely than male officers to highlight that officers in their department would make negative comments about rape victims.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rich, K., & Seffrin, P.
Affiliations
Marywood University (US)
Venue
Feminist Criminology
Published
2014-02-24
Volume
9
Issue
2
Pages
137-159
ISSN
  • 1557-0851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-086X
OpenAlex
W2166808321
Cited by
18
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
5.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Feminist Criminology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Keywords
women in policing, gendered institutions, rape victims, victim advocacy, gendered crime

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review