Cited by 98Gender Roles and Identity StudiesAgriculture and Farm SafetyResilience and Mental Health

“Do it All by Myself”: A Salutogenic Approach of Masculine Health Practice Among Farming Men Coping With Stress

Open access
Roy, Philippe, Tremblay, Gilles, Robertson, Steven, Houle, Janie·2017·American Journal of Men's Health

Abstract

Farming is often considered one of the most stressful occupations. At the same time, farming men symbolically represent a strong, traditional, or hegemonic form of masculinity based on stoicism, resourcefulness, and resilience to adversity. A contrast is observed between this social representation and their health status, marked by higher levels of stress, social isolation, psychological distress, and suicide than many other subgroups of men. A salutogenic approach was taken in this study to enable the investigation of the social contexts in which farming men positively engage in health-promoting behaviors that may prevent or ameliorate mental health problems. A focus was placed on how farming men cope with stress on their own, and the relationship of this to their popular image of being resourceful and resilient. Thirty-two individual in-depth interviews with farming men and a focus group with five key informants working in rural areas within the Province of Quebec, Canada, were carried out. Self-distraction and cognitive strategies emerged as the most relevant for participants. Notably, taking work breaks conflicted with the discourse of the “relentless worker” that farmers are expected to be. Pathways to positive coping and recovery implied an ambivalence between contemplation of strategies aligned with negative aspects of traditional masculinity norms in North America and strategies aligned with more positive, progressive aspects of these norms based on the importance of family and work life balance. Health promotion and future research should investigate how various positive masculine practices can be aligned with farmers’ health and well-being and that of their family.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1557988315619677

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roy, P., Tremblay, G., Robertson, S., & Houle, J.
Affiliations
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
  • Université Laval (CA)
  • Leeds Beckett University, Queen Square House, Leeds, UK
  • Université du Québec à Montréal (CA)
Corresponding author
Roy, Philippe
Venue
American Journal of Men's Health
Published
2015-12-03
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
1536-1546
ISSN
  • 1557-9883 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9891
OpenAlex
W2284617328
Cited by
94
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 8
FWCI
7.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Men s Health (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Leeds Beckett Repository (Leeds Beckett University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Masculinities & Society research team
  • Fondation Desjardins
  • Faculty of Social Sciences at Universit Laval
  • Public Health and the Agricultural Rural Ecosystem (PHARE) of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) and their partners
  • Fonds Qubcois de recherche sur la socit et la culture (n/a)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Agriculture and Farm Safety
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
Keywords
salutogenesis, occupational stress, coping strategies, hegemonic masculinity, Stoicism, resilience, self-distraction, cognitive strategies, rest breaks, work-life balance, family, mental health, suicide, social isolation, rural health, Quebec
MeSH terms
Farmers, Occupational Stress, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Health Promotion, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Quebec, Rural Population, Health Behavior, Focus Groups, Qualitative Research, Men's Health, Masculinity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review