Cited by 20Digital Mental Health InterventionsMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAgriculture and Farm Safety

A Self-Help Online Intervention Is Associated with Reduced Distress and Improved Mental Wellbeing in Australian Farmers: The Evaluation and Key Mechanisms of www.ifarmwell.com.au

Open access
Gunn, Kate M., Skaczkowski, Gemma, Dollman, James, Vincent, Andrew D., Brumby, Susan, Short, Camille E., Turnbull, Deborah·2023·Journal of Agromedicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Farmers are faced with many stressors, along with numerous barriers to accessing traditional forms of mental health support. The ifarmwell online intervention was co-designed with farmers and is informed by Acceptance and Commitment Therapy to equip farmers with transferable coping strategies, particularly to help them cope with circumstances beyond their control. We aimed to evaluate the effect of ifarmwell on farmers' short- and long-term distress and mental wellbeing. METHODS: Australian farmers (21-73 years) who registered on www.ifarmwell.com.au completed measures at the commencement of module 1 (N = 228), the end of the intervention (N = 77) and 6-months post-intervention (N = 61). Primary outcomes included distress (Kessler Psychological Distress Scale) and mental wellbeing (Mental Health Continuum - Short Form). We also examined the relationship between distress, mental wellbeing, neuroticism (Quickscales-R) and ACT-based psychological mechanisms; psychological inflexibility (Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II), cognitive fusion (Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire), believability of automatic thoughts (Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire-B), coping via acceptance (4 items from the situational COPE) and mindfulness (Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire-Short Form). Secondary outcomes of acceptability (Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8) and usability (System Usability Scale) were also explored. RESULTS: = -0.33, 95%CI = [-0.47, -0.19]). Decreases in distress and increases in mental wellbeing were associated with decreases in psychological inflexibility, cognitive fusion, and believability of thoughts, and increases in coping via acceptance and mindfulness. Levels of satisfaction (M = 26.92/32) and usability (M = 84.70/100) were high, and 94.6% of participants said they would recommend ifarmwell to a friend in need of similar advice and tools. CONCLUSIONS: ifarmwell is an effective and usable intervention that is likely to help farmers reduce their levels of distress and improve their mental wellbeing, by improving their psychological flexibility, ability to focus on the present and accept things beyond their control, as well as by reducing the extent to which they believe unhelpful thoughts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1059924x.2022.2156642

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gunn, K. M., Skaczkowski, G., Dollman, J., Vincent, A. D., Brumby, S., Short, C. E., & Turnbull, D.
Affiliations
  • University of South Australia (AU)
  • Freemasons Foundation Centre for Men's Health (AU)
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Gunn, Kate M.
Venue
Journal of Agromedicine
Published
2022-12-17
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
378-392
ISSN
  • 1059-924X (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-0813
OpenAlex
W4311860146
Cited by
20
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 1
FWCI
3.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Agromedicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UniSA Research Outputs Repository (University of South Australia) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
NAB Foundation, University of South Australia, Freemasons Centre for Male Health and Wellbeing and the Freemasons Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Agriculture and Farm Safety
Keywords
farmer mental health, online self-help intervention, acceptance and commitment therapy, psychological inflexibility, cognitive fusion, automatic thoughts, mindfulness, psychological distress, psychological well-being, neuroticism, co-design
MeSH terms
Farmers, Psychological Distress, Internet-Based Intervention, Australasian People, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Australia, Mental Disorders, Humans, Mental Health, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Self Care, Young Adult, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review