Cited by 25Sexual function and dysfunction studiesHormonal and reproductive studiesSexuality, Behavior, and Technology

Psychobiological protective factors modifying the association between age and sexual health in men: Findings from the Men's Health 40+ Study

Open access
Walther, Andreas, Mahler, Fiona, Debelak, Rudolf, Ehlert, Ulrike·2017·American Journal of Men s Health

Abstract

Sexual health severely decreases with age. For males older than 40 years, erectile dysfunction (ED) is the most common sexual disorder. Although physical and psychological risk factors for ED have been identified, protective factors are yet to be determined. To date, no study has examined endocrine and psychosocial factors in parallel with regard to their modifying effect on the age-related increase in ED. Two hundred and seventy-one self-reporting healthy men aged between 40 and 75 years provided both psychometric data on sexual function and a set of potential psychosocial protective factors, and saliva samples for the analysis of steroid hormones and proinflammatory cytokines. Around 35% of the participants reported at least a mild form of ED. Direct associations with ED were identified for perceived general health, emotional support, relationship quality, intimacy motivation but not for steroid hormones or proinflammatory markers. Moderation analyses for the association between age and ED revealed positive effects for testosterone (T), dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), perceived general health, emotional support, intimacy motivation, and a negative effect for interleukin-6 (all p < .05; f 2 > .17). Group differences between older men with and without ED emerged for T, DHEA, and psychometric measures such as perceived general health, emotional support, satisfaction with life, and intimacy motivation (all p < .05; d > .3). Both psychosocial and endocrine parameters moderated the association between age and sexual health. Perceived general health, emotional support, intimacy motivation, and relationship quality emerged as psychosocial protective factors against ED. Higher T and DHEA and lower interleukin-6 levels also buffered against an age-related increase in ED.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1557988316689238

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lack of motivation may interfere with treatment adherence or may cause men to decide not to pursue any treatment at all.

    “Age should be taken into account when proposing a treatment because lack of motivation may interfere with treatment adherence or may cause men to decide not to pursue any treatment at all.83,95”

    From A Psychosocial Approach to Erectile Dysfunction: Position Statements from the European Society of Sexual Medicine (ESSM) (2021) · cites this paper as [95]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports an age-related loss of intimacy motivation among men with erectile dysfunction and calls for age-tailored treatment approaches. It does not say that low motivation interferes with treatment adherence or leads men to decline treatment. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Possible reasons for treatment drop-out include treatment costs and side-effects, recovery of natural erectile capability, lack of interest in sexual activity, lack of spontaneity and artificial intimacy associated with sexual aids, embarrassment, new demands inducing performance anxiety, unrealistic expectations, and relational issues such as communication problems, lack of confidence, and lackof

    “Although more work is needed to identify the exact reasons for treatment drop-out, there is a possible role of treatment costs and side-effects, recovery of natural erectile capability, lack of interest in sexual activity, lack of spontaneity and artificial intimacy associated with the use of sexual aids, embarrassment, new demands that induce performance anxiety, unrealistic expectations, and”

    From A Psychosocial Approach to Erectile Dysfunction: Position Statements from the European Society of Sexual Medicine (ESSM) (2021) · cites this paper as [95]

    The Introduction and Conclusion discuss risk and protective factors for erectile dysfunction, including relationship quality, but do not address why men drop out of treatment. Searches for treatment drop-out, costs, side effects, sexual aids, and discontinuation found no passage supporting the proposed reasons. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Backhaus K. Erichson B. Plinke W. Weiber R. (2015). Multivariate analysis methods: An application-oriented introduction. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
  2. Schumacher J. Leppert K. Gunzelmann T. Strauß B. Brähler E. (2005). Die Resilienzskala—Ein Fragebogen zur Erfassung der psychischen Widerstandsfähigkeit als Personmerkmal [ The Resilience Scale—A questionnaire to assess resilience as a personality characteristic]. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie, Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, 53(1), 16- 39. Retrieved from http://www.mentalhealthpromotion.net/resources/resilienzskala2.pdf
  3. Walther A. Ehlert U. (2015). Steroid secretion and psychological well-being in men 40+. In Rice T. Sher L. (Eds.), Neurobiology of men’s mental health (pp. 287- 322). New York, NY: Nova.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Walther, A., Mahler, F., Debelak, R., & Ehlert, U.
Affiliations
University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Ehlert, Ulrike
Venue
American Journal of Men s Health
Published
2017-02-13
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
737-747
ISSN
  • 1557-9883 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9891
OpenAlex
W2588214242
Cited by
25
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5
FWCI
3.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Men s Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
University Research Priority Program – Dynamics of Healthy Aging
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal and reproductive studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Keywords
erectile dysfunction, protective factors, older men, testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone, interleukin-6, inflammatory cytokines, general health perception, emotional support, relationship quality, sexual health, men's health
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Humans, Erectile Dysfunction, Male, Middle Aged, Gonadal Steroid Hormones, Interleukin-6, Cluster Analysis, Men's Health, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review