Cited by 115Physical Activity and HealthCardiovascular and exercise physiologyCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Physical Activity and Cardiovascular Disease: How Much Is Enough?

Open access
Carnethon, Mercedes R.·2009·American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine

Abstract

Physical inactivity is an established risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. However, although physical activity is recommended as a component of healthy lifestyle, the amount (intensity, duration, and frequency) of physical activity required to protect against coronary heart disease (CHD) and cerebrovascular disease (ie, stroke) is unclear. In general, there is a graded inverse association of physical activity with CHD and total cardiovascular disease (the combination of CHD and stroke). The patterns of association between physical activity dose and stroke are less clear; individual studies suggest a threshold effect for benefits, whereas meta-analytic studies report a graded inverse association. Despite known differences in physical activity behaviors between men and women, the patterns of association between dose of activity and cardiovascular diseases are similar by gender. Observational studies of walking behaviors and one recent clinical trial suggest that lower “doses” of physical activity are associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular disease. Thus, with very few specific cautions, there is enough evidence to recommend to healthy adults that any activity is beneficial and that more activity is even better.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1559827609332737

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 2007, Chartbook on Trends in the Health of Americans

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Carnethon, M. R.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Carnethon, Mercedes R.
Venue
American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine
Published
2009-04-07
Volume
3
Issue
1_suppl
Pages
44S-49S
ISSN
  • 1559-8276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-8284
OpenAlex
W2112321505
Cited by
115
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Arizona State University
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R13HL091657)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Keywords
physical activity, cardiovascular disease, coronary artery disease, stroke, cerebrovascular disease, dose-response relationship, physical inactivity, threshold effects, walking, sex differences, health advice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review