Memoing in qualitative research: Probing data and processes
Abstract
This paper explores memoing in the context of qualitative research methodologies. The functions of memos in the research process are discussed and a number of techniques for employing memo writing to enhance the research experience and outcomes are examined. Memoing is often discussed in the literature as a technique employed in grounded theory research, yet there is limited exploration of the value of memo writing in qualitative methodologies generally. Memoing serves to assist the researcher in making conceptual leaps from raw data to those abstractions that explain research phenomena in the context in which it is examined. Memos can be effectively employed by both the novice and experienced researcher as a procedural and analytical strategy throughout the research process. Data exploration is enhanced, continuity of conception and contemplation is enabled and communication is facilitated through the use of memoing. While guidelines exist to aid in the production and use of memos, memoing remains a flexible strategy wherein the process of construction and nature of content is determined by the preferences and abilities of the researcher and the aims and focus of the specific research study.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The process of documenting reactions, emotions and related actions enables researchers to explore, challenge and intensify their sensitivity to the data.
“The process of documenting reactions, emotions and related actions enables researchers to explore, challenge and intensify their sensitivity to the data.34”
From Grounded theory research: A design framework for novice researchers (2019) · cites this paper as [34]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Theme development in qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis
Vaismoradi, M., Jones, J., Turunen, H., & Snelgrove, S. (2016) · Journal of Nursing Education and Practice · doi:10.5430/jnep.v6n5p100 · Cited by 1,994 · see citing works
A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE Guide No. 149.
Olmos-Vega, F. M., Stalmeijer, R. E., Varpio, L., & Kahlke, R. (2023) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2022.2057287 · Cited by 2,014 · see citing works
“Memos and field notes might be used to document critical interpersonal dynamics impacting participants and their data; to record and probe decisions and to call attention to and build on moments of analytic insight (Birks et al. 2008); or to call attention to aspects of context that may impact or be impacted by the st…”
BackgroundGrounded theory research: A design framework for novice researchers
Chun Tie, Y., Birks, M., & Francis, K. (2019) · SAGE Open Medicine · doi:10.1177/2050312118822927 · Cited by 1,869 · see citing works
Self-citationPatient apprehensions about the use of artificial intelligence in healthcare
Richardson, J. P., Smith, C., Curtis, S., Watson, S., Zhu, X., Barry, B., & Sharp, R. R. (2021) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-021-00509-1 · Cited by 424 · see citing works
Zhang, Z., Xu, Y., Wang, Y., Yao, B., Ritchie, D., Wu, T., Yu, M., Wang, D., & Li, T. J.-J. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3517479 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Assessing the Fairness of AI Systems: AI Practitioners' Processes, Challenges, and Needs for Support
Madaio, M., Egede, L., Subramonyam, H., Wortman Vaughan, J., & Wallach, H. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3512899 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Invalidation experiences among non-binary adolescents
Johnson, K. C., LeBlanc, A. J., Deardorff, J., & Bockting, W. O. (2020) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499.2019.1608422 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Chamberlain-Salaun, J., Mills, J., & Usher, K. (2013) · Sage Open · doi:10.1177/2158244013505757 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Krugu, J. K., Mevissen, F. E. F., Prinsen, A., & Ruiter, R. A. C. (2016) · Reproductive Health · doi:10.1186/s12978-016-0161-9 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Making it Work, or Not: A Longitudinal Study of Career Trajectories Among Online Freelancers
Blaising, A., Kotturi, Y., Kulkarni, C., & Dabbish, L. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3432925 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Schiff, D. S. (2023) · Review of Policy Research · doi:10.1111/ropr.12535 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
It’s More Than a Blood Test: Patients’ Perspectives on Noninvasive Prenatal Testing
Farrell, R., Mercer, M., Agatisa, P., Smith, M., & Philipson, E. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm3020614 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Hadjistavropoulos, H. D., Faller, Y. N., Klatt, A., Nugent, M. N., Dear, B. F., & Titov, N. (2018) · Community Mental Health Journal · doi:10.1007/s10597-018-0286-0 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Dichter, M. E., Sorrentino, A. E., Haywood, T. N., Tuepker, A., Newell, S., Cusack, M., & True, G. (2019) · Women's Health Issues · doi:10.1016/j.whi.2019.03.007 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Children's Mental Models of AI Reasoning: Implications for AI Literacy Education
Dangol, A., Wolfe, R., Zhao, R., Kim, J., Ramanan, T., Davis, K., & Kientz, J. A. (2025) · Proceedings of the 24th Interaction Design and Children · doi:10.1145/3713043.3728856 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Smolej, E., Malozewski, M., McKendry, S., Diab, K., Daubert, C., Farnum, A., Orianna, S., Reel, K., & Cameron, J. I. (2023) · Palliative and Supportive Care · doi:10.1017/s1478951522000116 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Hackett, K., Kazemi, M., Lafleur, C., Nyella, P., Godfrey, L., & Sellen, D. (2019) · Health Policy and Planning · doi:10.1093/heapol/czz036 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
McNeil, M. J., Kiefer, A., Woods, C., Barnett, B., Berry‐Carter, K., Clark, L., Mandrell, B. N., Snaman, J., Kaye, E. C., & Baker, J. N. (2022) · Cancer Medicine · doi:10.1002/cam4.4696 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Skinner, K., Hanning, R., Metatawabin, J., & Tsuji, L. (2014) · Rural and Remote Health · doi:10.22605/rrh2545 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Lewis, E. M., Murugan, V., Williams, K. A., Barth, R. P., & Lee, B. R. (2022) · Child & Family Social Work · doi:10.1111/cfs.12908 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
The experiences of older caregivers of cancer patients following hospital discharge
Schwartz, A. J., Riedel, R. F., LeBlanc, T. W., Desai, D., Jenkins, C., Mahoney, E., Humphreys, J., & Hendrix, C. C. (2019) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-018-4355-2 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Button, M. L., Norouzian, N., Westra, H. A., Constantino, M. J., & Antony, M. M. (2019) · Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1080/10503307.2018.1425932 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Embodied renegotiation: Redefining male body image through yoga in Korea.
Kim, J., & Heo, J. (2026) · Body Image · doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2026.102035 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Birks, M., Chapman, Y., & Francis, K.
- Affiliations
- Monash University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Birks, Melanie
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Nursing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 68-75
- ISSN
- 1361-4096 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-9871
- 1744-988X
- OpenAlex
- W2170518570
- Cited by
- 1,519
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 150 · 2025: 161 · 2024: 184 · 2023: 158 · 2022: 160 · 2021: 145 · 2020: 109 · 2019: 103 · 2018: 79 · 2017: 64 · 2016: 52 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 20.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of research in nursing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Data Analysis and Archiving
- Keywords
- memoing, memo writing, qualitative research methodology, grounded theory, conceptualization, exploratory data analysis, researcher self-reflection, scholarly communication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
