Cited by 37Digital Mental Health InterventionsTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Patient Perspectives on Strengths and Challenges of Therapist-Assisted Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behaviour Therapy: Using the Patient Voice to Improve Care

Open access
Hadjistavropoulos, H. D., Faller, Y. N., Klatt, A., Nugent, M. N., Dear, B. F., Titov, N.·2018·Community Mental Health Journal

Abstract

Therapist-assisted internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy (T-ICBT) involves patients reading online treatment materials, completing relevant exercises, and receiving therapist support. This study aimed to understand the preferences and recommendations of 225 patients enrolled in a T-ICBT course for depression and anxiety via an online therapy unit in collaboration with community mental health clinics dispersed across one Canadian province. An open-ended survey asked participants their opinions of the course and responses were analyzed using a content analysis approach. Patient comments addressed many strengths of the course (64%), with some opportunities for improvement (36%). Most-appreciated features included ability to download content for future use, reading other patients' experiences, and content of lessons. Patients made suggestions for improving the breadth of patient stories, timeline of the course, and matching availability of the therapist to patient need. Patient feedback regarding preferences provides valuable information for improving the patient-centered nature of T-ICBT.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10597-018-0286-0

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is an adequate sample size to provide deeper understanding of patients' experiences.

    “It is an adequate sample size to provide deeper understanding of patients ' experiences (Hadjistavropoulos et al ., 2018)”

    From A qualitative study of patients’ experiences and acceptance of computerised cognitive behavioural therapy in primary care, Scotland (2021) · cites this paper as Hadjistavropoulos et al., 2018

    The Results (Overview; page unavailable) report 135 respondents, and the Discussion calls the feedback valuable for understanding patient preferences. But the Discussion also says the brief questionnaire comments limited depth and that interviews would likely provide a deeper understanding. The paper does not establish that its sample size was adequate for that deeper understanding. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hadjistavropoulos, H. D., Faller, Y. N., Klatt, A., Nugent, M. N., Dear, B. F., & Titov, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Regina (CA)
  • Macquarie University (AU)
Corresponding author
Hadjistavropoulos, H. D.
Venue
Community Mental Health Journal
Published
2018-05-26
Volume
54
Issue
7
Pages
944-950
ISSN
  • 0010-3853 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2789
OpenAlex
W2803216717
Cited by
37
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2
FWCI
4.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Community Mental Health Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (293379)
  • Saskatchewan Health Research Foundation
  • Rx&D Health Research Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
patient perspectives, depression, anxiety, online therapy, patient-centered care, patient feedback, community mental health centers, therapist availability, course design
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Patient Satisfaction, Internet, Patient Preference, Quality Improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review