Cited by 8Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Mortality salience in an offline and online setting

Open access
Chew, Peter K. H., Yap, Brian L. M.·2022·Death Studies

Abstract

The current study aims to examine the effects of mortality salience effects on worldview defense in an offline and online setting. Participants were 146 (66 offline and 80 online) Singaporeans. Participants were randomly assigned to either the mortality salience condition or the control condition and after a delay completed a Worldview Defense Assessment. No significant mortality salience effects on worldview defense occurred in either setting. The results might be explained by the Asian sample, Singapore's culture of tolerance, and data collection during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Future research directions include examining the effects of COVID-19 in activating worldview defense.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07481187.2021.1888826

Cites

38 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These authors suggested that East Asian individuals may be more tolerant and/or fear death less than Westerners, both of which mitigate the terror that underlies MS inductions, potentially due to reduced individualism within these cultures.

    “These authors suggested that East Asian individuals may be more tolerant and/or fear death less than Westerners, both of which mitigate the “terror” that underlies MS inductions, potentially due to reduced individualism within these cultures.”

    From Not so terrifying after all? A set of failed replications of the mortality salience effects of Terror Management Theory (2023) · cites this paper as [32]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) suggests that an Asian sample and Singapore’s culture of tolerance might explain the absent mortality-salience effect. It describes tolerance toward other ethnic and religious groups, not greater tolerance of death; it does not say East Asians fear death less than Westerners or link the result to reduced individualism. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • There have long been failures to replicate some of the basic effects seen in the TMT literature.

    “There have also long been failures to replicate some of the basic effects seen in TMT literature [e.g., Ochsman, personal communication, cited in 27], even with meticulous methods, faithful experimental conditions, and enviable sample sizes [31, 32, 47–50].”

    From Not so terrifying after all? A set of failed replications of the mortality salience effects of Terror Management Theory (2023) · cites this paper as [32]

    In “Mortality salience in an offline and online setting” (page not provided), the paper reports that a 21-laboratory study with 2,220 participants failed to replicate a classic mortality-salience effect. Its Discussion also reports nonsignificant results in the authors’ own study. The copy does not establish that the failed replications used meticulous methods or faithful experimental conditions; it notes that relevant laboratory procedures can vary across studies. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Several groups who recruited primarily East Asian samples were unable to find significant effects or identified very small effects.

    “Several groups who recruited primarily East Asian samples were unable to find significant effects or identified very small effects [e.g., 31–34].”

    From Not so terrifying after all? A set of failed replications of the mortality salience effects of Terror Management Theory (2023) · cites this paper as [32]

    The Discussion reports nonsignificant mortality-salience effects in both the offline and online groups. However, the Participants section identifies the sample as Singaporeans or long-term residents, and the Discussion says ethnicity was not collected. The paper therefore does not establish that its own sample was primarily East Asian. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Chatard A., 2020, PsyArXiv
  2. Klein R. A., 2019, PsyArXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chew, P. K. H., & Yap, B. L. M.
Affiliations
James Cook University Singapore (SG)
Corresponding author
Chew, Peter K. H.
Venue
Death Studies
Published
2021-02-23
Volume
46
Issue
9
Pages
2085-2092
ISSN
  • 0748-1187 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-7683
OpenAlex
W3131844713
Cited by
8
References
40
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Death Studies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline at James Cook University (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
mortality salience, worldview defense, COVID-19 pandemic, Asian participants, fear of death
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Attitude to Death, Humans, Asian People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review