Cited by 63Diabetes Management and ResearchElectrochemical sensors and biosensorsPancreatic function and diabetes

Metabolic Biofouling of Glucose Sensors in Vivo : Role of Tissue Microhemorrhages

Open access
Klueh, Ulrike, Liu, Zenghe, Feldman, Ben, Henning, Timothy P., Cho, Brian, Ouyang, Tianmei, Kreutzer, Don·2011·Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Abstract

Objective: Based on our in vitro study that demonstrated the adverse effects of blood clots on glucose sensor function, we hypothesized that in vivo local tissue hemorrhages, induced as a consequence of sensor implantation or sensor movement post-implantation, are responsible for unreliable readings or an unexplained loss of functionality shortly after implantation. Research Design and Methods: To investigate this issue, we utilized real-time continuous monitoring of blood glucose levels in a mouse model. Direct injection of blood at the tissue site of sensor implantation was utilized to mimic sensor-induced local tissue hemorrhages. Results: It was found that blood injections, proximal to the sensor, consistently caused lowered sensor glucose readings, designated temporary signal reduction, in vivo in our mouse model, while injections of plasma or saline did not have this effect. Conclusion: These results support our hypothesis that tissue hemorrhage and resulting blood clots near the sensor can result in lowered local blood glucose concentrations due to metabolism of glucose by the clot. The lowered local blood glucose concentration led to low glucose readings from the still functioning sensor that did not reflect the systemic glucose level.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/193229681100500313

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Temporary signal reductions may result from local tissue damage caused by forces exerted on the sensor and may be solved by using more flexible materials.

    “Therefore, temporary signal reductions may actually be the result of local tissue damage caused by forces exerted on the sensor and may be solved by using more flexible materials.”
  • This reduction was explained by clot formation around the sensing portion of the CGM device, which formed a glucose sink until clearance.

    “This reduction was explained by the clot formation around the sensing portion of the CGM device that formed a glucose sink until clearance.133”
  • Injection of blood, but not saline or plasma, led to a temporary signal reduction lasting several hours that eventually returned to normal.

    “the injection of blood, but not saline or plasma, led to a temporary (i.e., several hours) signal reduction that eventually returned to normal.133”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klueh, U., Liu, Z., Feldman, B., Henning, T. P., Cho, B., Ouyang, T., & Kreutzer, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • Abbott Diabetes Care (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Klueh, Ulrike
Venue
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Published
2011-05
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
583-595
ISSN
1932-2968 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2137240669
Cited by
63
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 1
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
Keywords
glucose sensor, microhemorrhages, blood clots, continuous glucose monitoring
MeSH terms
Animals, Blood Coagulation, Blood Glucose, Disease Models, Animal, Equipment Design, Female, Hemorrhage, Humans, Mice, Inbred ICR, Sensitivity and Specificity, Time Factors, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Biosensing Techniques, Prostheses and Implants, Mice, Biofouling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review