Cited by 97Diabetes Management and ResearchElectrochemical sensors and biosensorsPancreatic function and diabetes

Susceptibility of Interstitial Continuous Glucose Monitor Performance to Sleeping Position

Open access
Mensh, Brett D., Wisniewski, Natalie A., Neil, Brian M., Burnett, Daniel R.·2013·Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Abstract

Background Developing a round-the-clock artificial pancreas requires accurate and stable continuous glucose monitoring. The most widely used continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) are percutaneous, with the sensor residing in the interstitial space. Inaccuracies in percutaneous CGM readings during periods of lying on the devices (e.g., in various sleeping positions) have been anecdotally reported but not systematically studied. Methods In order to assess the impact of sleep and sleep position on CGM performance, we conducted a study in human subjects in which we measured the variability of interstitial CGM data at night as a function of sleeping position. Commercially available sensors were placed for 4 days in the abdominal subcutaneous tissue in healthy, nondiabetic volunteers (four sensors per person, two per side). Nocturnal sleeping position was determined from video recordings and correlated to sensor data. Results We observed that, although the median of the four sensor readings was typically 70-110 mg/dl during sleep, individual sensors intermittently exhibited aberrant glucose readings (>25 mg/dl away from median) and that these aberrant readings were strongly correlated with subjects lying on the sensors. We expected and observed that most of these aberrant sleep-position-related CGM readings were sudden decreases in reported glucose values, presumably due to local blood-flow decreases caused by tissue compression. Curiously, in rare cases, the aberrant CGM readings wer…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/193229681300700408

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CGMs measure interstitial fluid glucose that has diffused from capillaries into subcutaneous tissue and may indicate a falsely low blood glucose due to device compression, device calibration errors, and skin/soft tissue infections.

    “These devices measure interstitial fluid glucose that has diffused from the capillaries and into the subcutaneous tissue and may indicate a falsely low BG due to device compression, device calibration errors, and skin/soft tissue infections [4,6,7].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mensh, B. D., Wisniewski, N. A., Neil, B. M., & Burnett, D. R.
Affiliations
  • Theranova (United States) (US)
  • Profusa (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Mensh, Brett D.
Venue
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Published
2013-07
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
863-870
ISSN
1932-2968 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W20091527
Cited by
97
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6
FWCI
3.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
Keywords
continuous glucose monitoring, interstitial fluid, sleep position, sensor accuracy, artificial pancreas, nocturnal glucose, tissue compression, subcutaneous blood flow, sensor artifacts
MeSH terms
Abdomen, Adult, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Glucose, Humans, Male, Posture, Sleep, Video Recording, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Biosensing Techniques, Implants, Experimental, Extracellular Fluid, Subcutaneous Fat

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review