Cited by 68Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Treatment and Management

Design of the Glucose Rate Increase Detector: A Meal Detection Module for the Health Monitoring System

Open access
Harvey, Rebecca A., Dassau, Eyal, Zisser, Howard, Seborg, Dale E., Doyle, Francis J.·2014·Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Abstract

Background: The Glucose Rate Increase Detector (GRID), a module of the Health Monitoring System (HMS), has been designed to operate in parallel to the glucose controller to detect meal events and safely trigger a meal bolus. Methods: The GRID algorithm was tuned on clinical data with 40-70 g CHO meals and tested on simulation data with 50-100 g CHO meals. Active closed- and open-loop protocols were executed in silico with various treatments, including automatic boluses based on a 75 g CHO meal and boluses based on simulated user input of meal size. An optional function was used to reduce the recommended bolus using recent insulin and glucose history. Results: For closed-loop control of a 3-meal scenario (50, 75, and 100 g CHO), the GRID improved median time in the 80-180 mg/dL range by 17% and in the >180 range by 14% over unannounced meals, using an automatic bolus for a 75 g CHO meal at detection. Under open-loop control of a 75 g CHO meal, the GRID shifted the median glucose peak down by 73 mg/dL and earlier by 120 min and reduced the time >180 mg/dL by 57% over a missed-meal bolus scenario, using a full meal bolus at detection. Conclusions: The GRID improved closed-loop control in the presence of large meals, without increasing late postprandial hypoglycemia. Users of basal-bolus therapy could also benefit from GRID as a safety alert for missed meal corrections.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1932296814523881

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harvey, R. A., Dassau, E., Zisser, H., Seborg, D. E., & Doyle, F. J.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Venue
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Published
2014-03
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
307-320
ISSN
1932-2968 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2137448120
Cited by
68
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK085628, DP3DK094331)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
meal detection, artificial pancreas, multiple daily insulin injections, postprandial hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, carbohydrate intake, diabetes management, health monitoring system

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review