Cited by 25Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Management and EducationMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Efficacy of Insulclock in Patients with Poorly Controlled Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Pilot, Randomized Clinical Trial

Open access
Gomez-Peralta, Fernando, Abreu, Cristina, Gomez-Rodriguez, Sara, Cruz-Bravo, Margarita, María-Sanchez, Cristina, Poza, Gema, Ruiz-Valdepeñas, Luis·2020·Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Insulclock ® is an electronic device designed to improve treatment adherence and insulin injection tracking. This randomized, single-center, pilot study assessed the clinical impact of Insulclock on glycemic control and variability, treatment adherence, and satisfaction in patients with uncontrolled type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). We also compared these outcomes between the Active and Masked groups (with or without receiving reminders and app alerts). Sixteen patients completed the study: 10 in the Active group and 6 in the Masked group. Insulclock use was associated with a decrease in mean glucose (−27.0 mg/dL [1.5 mmol/L]; P = 0.013), glucose standard deviation (−14.4 mg/dL [0.8 mmol/L]; P = 0.003), and time above range (−12.5%; P = 0.0026), and an increase in time in range (TIR) (+7%; P = 0.038) in the overall population. The use of app information and alerts in the Active group was associated with an increase in TIR (+8%; P = 0.026). We observed a −3.9 ( P = 0.1352) and −5.4 ( P = 0.032) reduction per month in the number of missed and mistimed insulin doses in the overall population, respectively. Most of the items of the Insulin Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (ITSQ) improved after 4 weeks of Insulclock use. This pilot study points out an improvement in glycemic levels, adherence, and satisfaction in T1DM patients, supporting the development of clinical trials powered to confirm these effects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/dia.2019.0427

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gomez-Peralta, F., Abreu, C., Gomez-Rodriguez, S., Cruz-Bravo, M., María-Sanchez, C., Poza, G., & Ruiz-Valdepeñas, L.
Affiliations
  • Endocrinology and Nutrition Unit, Segovia General Hospital, Segovia, Spain.
  • Hospital General De Segovia (ES)
  • Research and Development Unit, Insulcloud S.L. (B87131454), Madrid, Spain.
Venue
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Published
2020-09
Volume
22
Issue
9
Pages
686-690
ISSN
  • 1520-9156 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8593
OpenAlex
W3008655620
Cited by
25
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, uncontrolled diabetes, medication adherence, glycemic control, glycemic variability, time in range, time above range
MeSH terms
Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Male, Pilot Projects, Medication Adherence, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review