Cited by 42Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Management and EducationMedication Adherence and Compliance

Association between treatment adherence and continuous glucose monitoring outcomes in people with diabetes using smart insulin pens in a real-world setting

Open access
Danne, Thomas P.A., Joubert, Michael, Hartvig, Niels Væver, Kaas, Anne, Knudsen, Nikoline Nygård, Mader, Julia K.·2024·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of insulin injection adherence, smart insulin pen engagement, and glycemic control using real-world data from 16 countries from adults self-administering basal insulin degludec and bolus insulin with a smart insulin pen (NovoPen 6 or NovoPen Echo Plus) alongside continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Data were aggregated over 14-day periods. Treatment adherence was defined according to the number of missed basal and missed bolus insulin doses and smart pen engagement according to the number of days with data uploads. RESULTS: Data from 3,945 adults, including 25,157 14-day periods with ≥70% CGM coverage, were analyzed. On average, 0.2 basal and 6.0 bolus insulin doses were missed over 14 days. The estimated probability of missing at least one basal insulin dose over a 14-day period was 17.6% (95% CI 16.5, 18.7). Missing one basal or bolus insulin dose per 14 days was associated with a significant decrease in percentage of time with glucose levels in range (TIR) (3.9–10.0 mmol/L), of −2.8% (95% CI −3.7, −1.8) and −1.7% (−1.8, −1.6), respectively; therefore, missing two basal or four bolus doses would decrease TIR by >5%. Smart pen engagement was associated positively with glycemic outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This combined analysis of real-world smart pen and CGM data showed that missing two basal or four bolus insulin doses over a 14-day period would be associated with a clinically relevant decrease in TIR. Smart insulin pens provide valuable insights into treatment injection behaviors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc23-2176

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a recent real-world study with multinational data from 3,954 adults with diabetes using a connected pen and CGM, treatment engagement with a connected insulin pen is positively associated with glycemic outcomes, and missing as little as two basal doses or four bolus insulin doses over a 14-day period is associated with a clinically relevant decrease in time in range of ≥5%.

    “A recent realworld study with multinational data collected from 3,954 adults with diabetes using a connected pen and CGM validated the fact that treatment engagement with a connected insulin pen is positively associated with glycemic outcomes.”

    From 7. Diabetes Technology: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [156]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [17]Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 2015; 67: 1– 48

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Danne, T. P. A., Joubert, M., Hartvig, N. V., Kaas, A., Knudsen, N. N., & Mader, J. K.
Affiliations
  • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE)
  • 2Diabetes Care Unit, Caen University Hospital, University of Caen Normandy, Caen, France
  • Novo Nordisk (Denmark) (DK)
  • Medical University of Graz (AT)
Corresponding author
Danne, Thomas P.A.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2024-04-03
Volume
47
Issue
6
Pages
995-1003
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W4393853146
Cited by
42
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 10
FWCI
13.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Novo Nordisk A/S
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
Keywords
medication adherence, smart insulin pens, continuous glucose monitoring, glycemic control, bolus insulin, time in range
MeSH terms
Treatment Adherence and Compliance, Continuous Glucose Monitoring, Adult, Aged, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Male, Middle Aged, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Insulin, Long-Acting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review