Cited by 36Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Management and EducationMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Efficacy of a connected insulin pen cap in people with noncontrolled type 1 diabetes: a multicenter randomized clinical trial

Open access
Gomez-Peralta, Fernando, Abreu, Cristina, Fernández-Rubio, Elsa, Cotovad, Laura, Pujante, Pedro, Gaztambide, Sonia, Bellido, Diego, Menéndez Torre, Edelmiro +5 more·2023·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of the insulin pen cap Insulclock on improving glycemic control, treatment adherence, and user satisfaction in people with type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial comprised a 4-week run-in phase and a 6-week double-arm phase in which participants were randomly assigned into an active or masked mode. RESULTS: Fifty-five participants were evaluable (active group, n = 26, masked group, n = 29). The increase in time in range was higher in the active versus masked group (5.2% vs. −0.8%; P = 0.016). The active group showed a higher reduction in mean glucose, glucose management indicator, time above range, and high blood glucose index. On-time insulin doses increased in the active group and decreased in the masked group. CONCLUSIONS: Insulclock system use was associated with improved glycemic control, glycemic variability, hyperglycemia risk, and treatment adherence in people with uncontrolled type 1 diabetes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc22-0525

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a multicenter randomized controlled trial in people with type 1 diabetes, use of an insulin pen cap was associated with improved glycemic outcomes at 6 weeks, with an increase in time in range and a decrease in GMI and time above range.

    “In a multicenter RCT in people with type 1 diabetes, the use of an insulin pen cap was associated with improved glycemic outcomes at 6 weeks in the insulin cap group, with an increase in TIR and decrease in GMI and TAR (154).”

    From 7. Diabetes Technology: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [154]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gomez-Peralta, F., Abreu, C., Fernández-Rubio, E., Cotovad, L., Pujante, P., Gaztambide, S., Bellido, D., Menéndez Torre, E., Ruiz-Valdepeñas, S., Bello, H., Valledor, X., Pérez-González, J., & Ruiz-Valdepeñas, L.
Affiliations
  • 1Endocrinology and Nutrition Unit, Hospital General de Segovia, Segovia, Spain
  • Hospital General De Segovia (ES)
  • Hospital de Cruces (ES)
  • Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Ferrol (ES)
  • Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (ES)
  • 4Endocrinology and Nutrition Unit, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, and Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias (ISPA), Oviedo, Spain
  • 5Research and Development Unit, Insulcloud S.L., Madrid, Spain
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2022-12-21
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
206-208
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W4310464466
Cited by
36
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 5
FWCI
5.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission (739148)
  • European Union (674505)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, glycemic control, glycemic variability, time in range, hyperglycemia, medication adherence, user satisfaction, uncontrolled diabetes
MeSH terms
Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Glucose, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Injections, Insulin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review