Cited by 26Endometriosis Research and TreatmentEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and ManagementGynecological conditions and treatments

Reduced Levels of Serum Pigment Epithelium-Derived Factor in Women With Endometriosis

Chen, Liqing, Fan, Ruijia, Huang, Xiufeng, Xu, Hong, Zhang, Xinmei·2012·Reproductive Sciences

Abstract

The authors previously demonstrated decreased levels of pigment epithelium-derived factor (PEDF) in peritoneal fluid of women with endometriosis compared to women without endometriosis. Here, the authors determine whether women with endometriosis have altered levels of PEDF in serum. Peripheral blood samples were collected from 71 women with and without endometriosis (n = 43 and 28, respectively) before laparoscopic surgery. Concentrations of serum PEDF were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. We detected lower levels of serum PEDF in women with endometriosis (16.3 ± 6.6 ng/mL) than in those without endometriosis (24.5 ± 7.3 ng/mL; P < .001). In women with endometriosis, the concentrations of serum PEDF were significantly lower in women with pain (n = 11, 12.6 ± 7.1 ng/mL) compared to women without pain (n = 32, 17.5 ± 6.0 ng/mL; P < .05). However, the concentrations of serum PEDF did not correlate with disease stage or site or infertility. In addition, the concentrations of serum PEDF did not show any difference in the phase of the cycle in either group. Our results suggest that reduced levels of serum PEDF in women with endometriosis and disease-related pain may play a role in the pathogenesis of this disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1933719111413300

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PEDF was significantly decreased in women with endometriosis (n=43) compared with women without endometriosis (n=28), independent of the phase of the cycle and correlated with pain symptoms.

    “In a study by Chen et al., PEDF was significantly decreased in women with endometriosis (n = 43) compared with women without endometriosis (n = 28), independent of the phase of the cycle and correlated with pain symptoms [71].”

    From Update on biomarkers for the detection of endometriosis (2015) · cites this paper as [71]

Cites

3 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, L., Fan, R., Huang, X., Xu, H., & Zhang, X.
Affiliations
Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Xinmei
Venue
Reproductive Sciences
Published
2012-01
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
64-69
ISSN
  • 1933-7191 (ISSN-L)
  • 1933-7205
OpenAlex
W2012106487
Cited by
26
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Reproductive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
Keywords
endometriosis, pigment epithelium-derived factor, endometriosis-associated pain, biomarkers, endometriosis pathogenesis, menstrual cycle phases
MeSH terms
Pigment Epithelium-Derived Factor, Adult, Endometriosis, Eye Proteins, Female, Humans, Nerve Growth Factors, Biomarkers, Serpins, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review