Cited by 33Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in InsectsPluripotent Stem Cells ResearchAnimal Genetics and Reproduction

Discovery of HeLa Cell Contamination in HES Cells: Call for Cell Line Authentication in Reproductive Biology Research

Open access
Kniss, Douglas A., Summerfield, Taryn L.·2014·Reproductive Sciences

Abstract

Continuous cell lines are used frequently in reproductive biology research to study problems in early pregnancy events and parturition. It has been recognized for 50 years that many mammalian cell lines contain inter- or intraspecies contaminations with other cells. However, most investigators do not routinely test their culture systems for cross-contamination. The most frequent contributor to cross-contamination of cell lines is the HeLa cell isolated from an aggressive cervical adenocarcinoma. We report on the discovery of HeLa cell contamination of the human endometrial epithelial cell line HES isolated in our laboratory. Short tandem repeat analysis of 9 unique genetic loci demonstrated molecular identity between HES and HeLa cells. In addition, we verified that WISH cells, isolated originally from human amnion epithelium, were also contaminated with HeLa cells. Inasmuch as our laboratory did not culture HeLa cells at the time of HES cell derivations, the source of contamination was the WISH cell line. These data highlight the need for continued diligence in authenticating cell lines used in reproductive biology research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1933719114522518

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • WISH was on the panel of cell models for differentiation in these institutions under its false identity as an amnion cell line of human origin.

    “WISH, which has been reported as a HeLa contaminant for decades [37], was also on the panel of cell models for differentiation [38] in these institutions under its false identity-amnion cell line of human origin.”

    From Investigation of Cross-Contamination and Misidentification of 278 Widely Used Tumor Cell Lines (2017) · cites this paper as [37]

    The Introduction and Discussion (page numbers unavailable) identify WISH as an amnion-derived cell line contaminated with HeLa and report its use in reproductive-biology research. They do not say WISH was on a panel of models for differentiation at the institutions described in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • WISH has been reported as a HeLa contaminant for decades.

    “WISH, which has been reported as a HeLa contaminant for decades [37], was also on the panel of cell models for differentiation [38] in these institutions under its false identity-amnion cell line of human origin.”

    From Investigation of Cross-Contamination and Misidentification of 278 Widely Used Tumor Cell Lines (2017) · cites this paper as [37]

    The Introduction and Discussion identify WISH as a cell line known to be contaminated with HeLa, and the paper reports confirming that contamination. The Discussion says HeLa contamination of cell lines has been reported for nearly 50 years, but it does not establish that WISH specifically had been reported as contaminated for decades; no page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • STR-based detection found HeLa contamination in the human endometrial cell line HES.

    “A striking example is the STR-based detection of HeLa contamination in the human endometrial cell line HES, highlighting the risk of secondary contamination [32,33].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kniss, D. A., & Summerfield, T. L.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Kniss, Douglas A.
Venue
Reproductive Sciences
Published
2014-08
Volume
21
Issue
8
Pages
1015-1019
ISSN
  • 1933-7191 (ISSN-L)
  • 1933-7205
OpenAlex
W2063792540
Cited by
33
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Reproductive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Johns Hopkins University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Animal Genetics and Reproduction
Keywords
cell line authentication, short tandem repeat profiling, cell line cross-contamination, immortalized cell lines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review