Cited by 62Electoral Systems and Political ParticipationPersonality Traits and PsychologyPopulism, Right-Wing Movements

Fear, Populism, and the Geopolitical Landscape: The “Sleeper Effect” of Neurotic Personality Traits on Regional Voting Behavior in the 2016 Brexit and Trump Elections

Open access
Obschonka, Martin, Stuetzer, Michael, Rentfrow, Peter J., Lee, Neil, Potter, Jeff, Gosling, Samuel D.·2018·Social Psychological and Personality Science

Abstract

Two recent electoral results—Donald Trump’s election as U.S. president and the UK’s Brexit vote—have reignited debate on the psychological factors underlying voting behavior. Both campaigns promoted themes of fear, lost pride, and loss aversion, which are relevant to the personality dimension of neuroticism, a construct previously not associated with voting behavior. To that end, we investigate whether regional prevalence of neurotic personality traits (neuroticism, anxiety, and depression) predicted voting behavior in the United States ( N = 3,167,041) and the United Kingdom ( N = 417,217), comparing these effects with previous models, which have emphasized the roles of openness and conscientiousness. Neurotic traits positively predicted share of Brexit and Trump votes, and Trump gains from Romney. Many of these effects persisted in additional robustness tests controlling for regional industrial heritage, political attitude, and socioeconomic features, particularly in the United States. The “sleeper effect” of neurotic traits may profoundly impact the geopolitical landscape.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1948550618755874

Cites

38 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is evidence that threats like scarcity and pathogen prevalence are associated with prejudice.

    “Indeed, there is evidence that threats like scarcity and pathogen prevalence are associated with prejudice [32–40].”
  • Across contemporary nations and US states, cultural tightness is negatively correlated with openness to new ideas and societal innovations that disrupt the social order.

    “Across contemporary nations [24] and US states [29], cultural tightness is negatively correlated with openness to new ideas and societal innovations that disrupt the social order [31–32]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Seligson, M. A (2007). The rise of populism and the left in Latin America. Journal of Democracy, 18(3), 81-95.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Obschonka, M., Stuetzer, M., Rentfrow, P. J., Lee, N., Potter, J., & Gosling, S. D.
Affiliations
  • Queensland University of Technology (AU)
  • Technische Universität Ilmenau (DE)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
  • Atof Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Obschonka, Martin
Venue
Social Psychological and Personality Science
Published
2018-03-08
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
285-298
ISSN
  • 1948-5506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1948-5514
OpenAlex
W2783584148
Cited by
62
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
34.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Psychological and Personality Science (publishedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Keywords
neuroticism, voting behavior, populism, fear, Brexit, Donald Trump, anxiety, depression, personality traits, political attitudes, socioeconomic factors, industrial heritage, sleeper effect, geopolitics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review